IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid (was Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid)

Liyan Gong <gongliyan@chinamobile.com> Mon, 19 August 2024 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B7BC169400; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dp6qbx22x0m9; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11FEC15793B; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee566c2fa5f5d6-615d8; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:55:13 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee566c2fa5f5d6-615d8
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from gongliyan@chinamobile.com ( [10.2.146.66] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-appsvr07-11007 (Richmail) with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:55:13 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:55:13 +0800
From: Liyan Gong <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2aff66c2e41dacc-00119.Richmail.00009032454910607037@chinamobile.com>
References: <DS0PR19MB6501543F9BEAACDEA944610DFCBF2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <DS0PR19MB6501FFCAE3CDFD489DC0C467FCBF2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>, <CAMZsk6eUbEAjSSq4_JQgwqkBvzoPtHRuuTJTfNJx5JBN0Utrsg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_149330_1954943536.1724054113684"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2aff66c2e41dacc-00119
Encrypt-Channel: web
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.5.01)
Message-ID-Hash: FA3PEZ4TIKBKKQTX2KHITNKBXSVKN6Y6
X-Message-ID-Hash: FA3PEZ4TIKBKKQTX2KHITNKBXSVKN6Y6
X-MailFrom: gongliyan@chinamobile.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-spri <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid (was Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/FPJ-e6_mgFmLqhEHIn-Qgz11k9A>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Tarek and Chairs,As a co-author, I think the latest version is ready for publication.Best Regards,Liyan

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 1:14PM Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi WG,


 


I am correcting a mistake to reference to the WG adopted draft (as opposed to the individual draft for the same document). Sorry for the confusion.


 


Regards,


Tarek


 




From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>                                                      Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 9:53AM To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org <draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org> Subject: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid



Dear WG,


 


This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid.


 


Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the  latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.


 


Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)


If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.


 


Note, currently there are no IPR disclosures against this document. 


 


This poll runs until August 20, 2024.


 


Thank you,


Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)


 






_______________________________________________ mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status