Re: [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00
Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Wed, 08 May 2013 19:22 UTC
Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2B521F8A7B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 12:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id buYh0g1yK01T for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 12:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8759521F89E2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 12:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id uk5so2060853obc.25 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 May 2013 12:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rTSFkhImZOQTDtjyjBWCvcW6xdX0IBLsr6IRbAs3ToQ=; b=xWYlXTgsK2L2NgHqw6G+/oGh2eW22PHbbDsS2EfcMeu3CgAd6fXQcRu+fsZxnIWqyj /37yB5UVHjjUp12Me+VfxliH/Ux0erhLGigWz7cN208RnLtayGcAegfGtY7GfbC9P8Z7 kFkt9sDmCIMp3ukSUClbP4yzAhrka4JiXZTQ9jD9vR9U2H6YBNqE2xlk/yVWnn1HVEzS 8Y8xHXTOvX9SW/9rVcwZVSQfy+pSqGpnWEzMv8notHFlIEuISGEQQJ1CpZG6VT4qVwg0 EQ2M4HmFUtVgIhjmS7mlvwRRLg5baATe46CL4cUwC5GvuwMCQAShCYte2yNO43UGIfQj x8xw==
X-Received: by 10.182.242.42 with SMTP id wn10mr821720obc.37.1368040956504; Wed, 08 May 2013 12:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([129.192.185.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ns4sm7768489obc.2.2013.05.08.12.22.34 for <mpls@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 08 May 2013 12:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <518AA5FD.7030704@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 21:22:37 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <20ECF67871905846A80F77F8F4A2757210150296@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E270A4750F7@TELMBB002RM001.telecomitalia.local>
In-Reply-To: <22257C41A415324A984CD03D63344E270A4750F7@TELMBB002RM001.telecomitalia.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 19:22:42 -0000
Hi, > Hi Eric, > You wrote "is it appropriate to make this priority swap?" > My answer is yes, it shall be done for the reasons explained in liaison 1205, bullet 1. It should be mandatory to swap to provide consistent behaviour. > You wrote "- what do we need to change? rfc5654? rfc4427? " > No I don't believe it is required to change any RFC but RFC 6378 Indeed RFC6378 should be fixed. Regards, Huub. > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Eric Osborne (eosborne) > Inviato: mercoledì 17 aprile 2013 14:16 > A: mpls@ietf.org > Oggetto: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 > > This thread is for discussing draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00. In brief, the draft proposes swapping the priorities between FS and SF-P (see section 4.3.2 of rfc6378). This proposed swap has a long history, dating back to when PSC was an ID. For some history, see > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1229/ > and > http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1234/ > > The questions that I think are relevant here are: > > - is it appropriate to make this priority swap? > - are there alternative approaches? > - what do we need to change? rfc5654? rfc4427? > - if we don't make the change, does this expose implementation to problems? > - if we do make the change, how do we go about it? > > but of course any and all discussion is welcome. > > As with the other threads I'm going to leave my two cents out of this introductory email but I'll chime in when discussion starts. > > > > > > eric > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > -- ***************************************************************** 请记住,你是独一无二的,就像其他每一个人一样
- [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Yuji Tochio
- [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
- Re: [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority… Yaacov Weingarten
- Re: [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- [mpls] R: PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Lou Berger
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Cavazzoni Carlo
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Pablo Frank
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Ryoo, Jeong-dong
- Re: [mpls] PSC: draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority-00 Yuji Tochio