[mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri, 14 November 2014 14:10 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18F11A0126; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:10:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJn7yRF7TbAN; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E63F1A0143; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:09:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.4
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20141114140945.13586.2308.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:09:45 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/G-p9fTipca-LevEbY-8mqnVJmtk
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-05.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:10:23 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping
Authors : Jian Luo
Lizhong Jin
Thomas Nadeau
George Swallow
Filename : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-05.txt
Pages : 15
Date : 2014-11-14
Abstract:
In some inter autonomous system (AS) and inter-area deployment
scenarios for RFC 4379 "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and
Traceroute", a replying LSR may not have the available route to the
initiator, and the Echo Reply message sent to the initiator would be
discarded resulting in false negatives or complete failure of
operation of LSP Ping and Traceroute. This document describes
extensions to LSP Ping mechanism to enable the replying Label
Switching Router (LSR) to have the capability to relay the Echo
Response by a set of routable intermediate nodes to the initiator.
This document updates RFC 4379.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-05
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-05
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay… internet-drafts