Received: from mail-pj2-x11.google.com (mail-pj2-x11.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:39::11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 737AB31 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20251104 header.b=s62YlJm2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of tony1athome@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:39::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tony1athome@gmail.com Received: by mail-pj2-x11.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2db1ca069c8so10705965ad.3 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:17:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1789582657; x=1790187457; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:content-type :message-id:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=u5ZkQKiDrVSQ2dTW5MwC5Ijzqv+D95iOouSLa6Ec6sg=; b=s62YlJm2k16YJdGC6RUaCksFXpe6Q47fggL3ZCTbhXsXfD5/SEhVT1lQKeMCxL2Rnm nGPHhPsU/7UbF7/U77d66fis1puivEMNOsovDucBmgLnTZDu0rlSmyn180ZpiHAh1886 XWv0fHo90cxAJ1bG4KcUGrcR3NIo0h/j0mC538NPbQwrEcyFZIP4ul3TSKZJAz/hVptn wL1sF7Ww49xTQnrH5tZbSzKM9T2k/cOsopQtBI2rm+iYy1BvnnukfFF5MnLrnxx8G9EM n1Hv1tyHkftoPF3N7hx3Xf9XbzUPB/AqbJMpi3MDEvgkNEkbbXICw5V1W+VYMCR+aL2n seyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1789582657; x=1790187457; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:content-type :message-id:from:sender:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=u5ZkQKiDrVSQ2dTW5MwC5Ijzqv+D95iOouSLa6Ec6sg=; b=Kf8+N5MOXzHFUVwogAP7IMOd4WvrEQ7fkqk9aZuKn4oS8rMLpdv+lB0jTSwJZy99TM 2L3lSEUaEyVgX9H6b1euZG8QJFmOC1B5cfZfM9CBYF9Qvxqch8mBStz3bbet8h5X6WHW CfYHOVzrFqUCjxNwirlaKgryBMH6XiKzPmH9qkAFc37wbMPYBTO0ZA+/kupVNyd3pVqG Sf6oqEwRyP+prmIwmxEHyhrvdcyg4vfi4DW3dPnAvtGhWi9h+DiPpyDDormhDdN1Q1e2 wv6mpV/pNds5DtQ41Gw2P56LY7JDGulOX2CZi2Oup6C80stBTJjgt+gHFkxFqsueoh8B tisQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvByu2XRjbcKF6VgyTY8qOvEKSALfUqS3rK9w50/fa19cnoSbGIgsZWkioMXUGtIMkevFEy01@ietf.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++nz5DrL+no1uJU0f7/dMaSXSf4k3HK+7ZVGzyyODzh7kbLrNev8 2Y9VfblM7e5MdgSMuTm0B5O6hSq5N6f/aN1/8urqlfkVbUpEXctvkR2S X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0rkurb3CjhuhR4e28n+ihItJFg9Ggne1l/crutuC//+pQ6rOXDyP7DNjbq/o4 FccTj8UpTV163ZQ5EYdtYe8KvI59FNKvX6wD37eJ3aeU32nQNNBmMICKREMQrCK8agN+DcCCWdw Hcenz73nYYY7OHbEhY5rf4lAr845xWTOFgpDuOnmBksLK0SftTNazGxstqzIyBeNCxEwA36zmPh wop+joegpEVG/e+TXK1JeSsvOD+d038fLRHKut1Vswdbpnm2AbJWuRdb0hCyiBg2ljFfguCMFf8 beQYA49Tu6+0BC0OYnptiFl45s2AbmB7jx+DWWhUQGe4e7+a/RNLL+hY+zxJ3fDjNW/GZBc8J0p VVsBFZJ8Rvn+28V+J/o/2O1fL84KhrvyftGBG0g6m21a+ziY036jw4LvsRamr1sivK/p7Dw60m6 fe1ghQKKHYMPqPaE6xpxpD0OMh1sJTbifZkp1v2OLQSwtKvKGV//xZX0idkgvcMzUZnPDWQg1YA rUDXqa/V+keVKb9sbztXbXQnwy7mdki7I8ezCcTYscSmFE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e545:b0:2db:2427:97d5 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2dd8dc0f70amr73027355ad.4.1789582656992; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-33c01728a7esm6387549eec.6.2026.09.16.11.17.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tony Li From: Tony Li Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6750E50-3DC8-421E-8790-3C758C4E0DA0" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.700.51.1.1\)) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:17:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: Haoyu Song References: <7285B839-430E-45CD-A45E-1D5B20D6B0B4@tony.li> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.700.51.1.1) X-Spam-Level: * X-Spamd-Bar: + Message-ID-Hash: 6MBVDBIQWAAATKOPLNORRNCV4UQMCPR3 X-Message-ID-Hash: 6MBVDBIQWAAATKOPLNORRNCV4UQMCPR3 X-MailFrom: tony1athome@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag@ietf.org" , mpls X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Subject: [mpls] Re: Preliminary shepherd's writeup on draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-03 List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Apple-Mail=_D6750E50-3DC8-421E-8790-3C758C4E0DA0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Haoyu, Thank you for your changes. idnits now reports that the line spacing of one of your figures is = funny. I think it is trying to interpret it as text. This can be = ignored. idnits v3 now requests that you have a citation for BCP 14, as you did = in -03. You can=E2=80=99t win. :-). I think that this can also be = ignored. Thank you for fixing the reference. I am waiting to hear back from Carlos regarding his comments and whether = you have satisfied his objections. Cheers, Tony > On Sep 16, 2026, at 10:17=E2=80=AFAM, Haoyu Song = wrote: >=20 > Hi Tony, > =20 > Thank you for the shepherd writeup! > We=E2=80=99ve updated the document to fix the two issues you mentioned = in the writeup. Here=E2=80=99s the draft link: = draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-04 - MPLS On-Path Telemetry = Network Action Flag for OAM = > =20 > I forgot where I got the template which causes the boilerplate issue = but it has been fixed now. > =20 > Best regards, > Haoyu =20 > =20 > From: Tony Li > = On Behalf Of Tony Li > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2026 5:33 PM > To: draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag@ietf.org = > Cc: mpls > > Subject: Preliminary shepherd's writeup on = draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-03 > =20 > Hi authors, > =20 > I have posted a preliminary shepherd=E2=80=99s writeup on your draft: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag/sh= epherdwriteup/ > =20 > Please review. > =20 > There are two points that I would like to raise: > =20 > 1) The idnits tool takes an issue with your RFC 2119 boilerplate. = Please see: = https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=3Dhttps://www.ietf.org/archiv= e/id/draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-03.txt. What tool are you = using to generate your draft? > =20 > 2) You have the post-stack header draft as an informative reference. = As you would like people using your bit in a post-stack header to comply = with that draft, that should probably be a normative reference. > =20 > Thanks, > Tony --Apple-Mail=_D6750E50-3DC8-421E-8790-3C758C4E0DA0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hi Haoyu,

Thank you = for your changes.

idnits now reports that the = line spacing of one of your figures is funny.  I think it is trying = to interpret it as text.  This can be = ignored.

idnits v3 now requests that you have a = citation for BCP 14, as you did in -03.  You can=E2=80=99t win. =  :-). I think that this can also be = ignored.

Thank you for fixing the = reference.

I am waiting to hear back from = Carlos regarding his comments and whether you have satisfied his = objections.

Cheers,
Tony


On Sep 16, 2026, at 10:17=E2=80=AFAM, Haoyu Song = <haoyu.song@futurewei.com> wrote:

Hi = Tony,
 
Thank you for the shepherd = writeup!
We=E2=80=99ve updated the document to fix the two issues you = mentioned in the writeup. Here=E2=80=99s the draft link: draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-04 - MPLS On-Path = Telemetry Network Action Flag for OAM
 
I forgot where I got the template which = causes the boilerplate issue but it has been fixed = now.
 
Best regards,
Haoyu =  
 
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Tony = Li
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2026 = 5:33 PM
To: draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag@ietf.org
Cc:<= /b> mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Preliminary shepherd's = writeup on = draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-03
 
Hi = authors,
 
I have posted a preliminary shepherd=E2=80=99s writeup on = your draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telem= etry-flag/shepherdwriteup/
 
Please = review.
 
There are two points that I would like to = raise:
 
1) The idnits tool takes an issue with your RFC 2119 = boilerplate.  Please see: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=3Dhttps://www.iet= f.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-on-path-telemetry-flag-03.txt. What = tool are you using to generate your draft?
 
2) You have the = post-stack header draft as an informative reference.  As you would = like people using your bit in a post-stack header to comply with that = draft, that should probably be a normative = reference.
 
Thanks,
Tony

= --Apple-Mail=_D6750E50-3DC8-421E-8790-3C758C4E0DA0--