Re: [mpls] [PWE3] 1588 over MPLS draft

"Shahram Davari" <davari@broadcom.com> Wed, 14 July 2010 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <davari@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3B63A6A9E; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1XdhFZYrBKCt; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mms2.broadcom.com (mms2.broadcom.com [216.31.210.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D8F3A696D; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.192.224] by mms2.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:06:55 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: D3C04415-6FA8-4F2C-93C1-920E106A2031
Received: from SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.130]) by SJEXCHHUB01.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.224]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:06:55 -0700
From: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
To: "curtis@occnc.com" <curtis@occnc.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:06:53 -0700
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] 1588 over MPLS draft
Thread-Index: AcsjdqeBK5kQ5GQWSx+iGBw4iS9MLAACF+Fg
Message-ID: <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6940EC28FB1@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:12:04 PDT." <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6940EC28967@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <201007141704.o6EH4T2I045662@harbor.orleans.occnc.com>
In-Reply-To: <201007141704.o6EH4T2I045662@harbor.orleans.occnc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 6023233410030845477-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>, "ticctoc@ietf.org" <ticctoc@ietf.org>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] 1588 over MPLS draft
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:06:58 -0000

Hi Cutris,

Are you saying you can't read the word doc? Could you do me a favor and tell me how to convert it to txt. I have been working on it without success. I am trying now to write it in XML (which I am learning now).

Also note that the main thing is the idea and not what format the document is. 

Thanks,
Shahram

-----Original Message-----
From: curtis@occnc.com [mailto:curtis@occnc.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 10:04 AM
To: Shahram Davari
Cc: ticctoc@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] 1588 over MPLS draft


In message <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6940EC28967@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
"Shahram Davari" writes:
>  
>  
> Hi All,
>  
> Please find attached our first draft of 1588 over MPLS. Since we have some =
> technical issues converting the Word format to Txt we couldn't  upload the =
> draft before the cut-off date. However we will present the draft in the nex=
> t IETF meeting and will upload the draft after the meeting.
>  
> Note that the main WG is TicToc but may require consultation with MPLS and =
> PWE3 WGs.
>  
> Thanks,
> Shahram Davari


IMO Attaching a word doc and asking for a slot at the meeting is
unacceptable.  At least convert the document to text or don't bother
and submit the draft after the meeting.  In any case, the cutoffs are
there for a reason and this should be given low priority at the
meeting (presented if there is time left over).

Curtis