Re: [mpls] please review and comment on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-00

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4AC120154; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7WdXKgpd12A; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CBA12018F; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id a27so11749183qkk.5; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YJRsUy0Iwda6Nv+PDuXmlcYYd52hPS456GdK2462CA8=; b=tZEjRMxRTyCfjSUvbhSsiQuMrhRYMc+uubnceeckDAC0ch/bCWof7N99FVQ+qmacKS CBGTkRYCuivPs0D9wTnMxgxjPm9tCFIm/Tn0CsOOfLxL2FZ7WVf+LjK2AMZijmOmG1L9 KNHg6ROK1uJR+l2IqvKcDVm4g7R59ItNPcOLPwTH2mePbv/bzsqrlZwOoLYiVbtIHawQ rb5rzVx8Ahnd5iJmv+JbPAKswloPX1MZ48G/eRphhUQoyQZX+HxbUtCJBKdsopMSm9ol 9kF9lwUjnQfofXaoAP04N4SXwkwc9japy/+8YNFVSN/+tdqtyf0nNr556gXDyg8/YnZ6 bESg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YJRsUy0Iwda6Nv+PDuXmlcYYd52hPS456GdK2462CA8=; b=IArgYkmUk1dOI5THnxcSaZRAJPjsGZxipor2ePNe2J3GSPzYFeaz8LjjxUm0KgoDfX KRVcZ+sCEOlbJZLlPMRJ144TLo+J9F4UOWPmZCmTS2N07M4eu2lxSIKtSTrQQNC2pmrW rlKwUGGsr+8+AAOoMFeoYBvuhWboTtGHCzF/PUp1GlaVxCyKlw0PGT2meANjNYVEI4eo guHMBfB7qg0hUBa5lqTKx4smRDm1kM5G0nmivHSgFCLCc4R230WlijgL4SekFnCl/cTB IQHM8G7qWnHUpmCMRAbQHqy63QL8uHo1advR4xV7IY9KCPulc9I8mqzbkwMCU+LfIfw2 YVpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX1uduWbXgx0FySHhDuy9/3eVNXyIJd6gd35zyYBEEKUh9w8/8N UiK6uJJiKJCJmvnHtiwa4gNi5l6GXPewCVM6PsOBhIIN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRX48/Qph8JCQPkgBMsu4tADrmNc9k9+NBEDsNQir0x9WDo0Tx8QgWGo11h2w2UaDgXQdaXHoQ0UEYXaJX+g4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:16a6:: with SMTP id s6mr16867454qkj.39.1563201022114; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <32b8812e-612f-ad46-5d7f-8a388e380680@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <32b8812e-612f-ad46-5d7f-8a388e380680@pi.nu>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:30:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0R06JHKFfNcZxSfD=L4RJVyV+XZmcjFLnkWE+-mtTtPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a2bfa7058db91961"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/GGsGZxZJuEO0O4Fvl9irq4b_SV0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] please review and comment on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:30:26 -0000

Loa,

During the WG adoption poll, I noted that your draft still refers to
draft-ietf-mpls-sfc and a forthcoming IANA allocation in that draft. That
draft has since been published as RFC 8595, and those allocations has been
made (16 and 17). This still needs to be updated in your draft.

That's it for my comments, otherwise I think it looks good.

Cheers,
Andy




On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:05 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> About a week ago we posted the first working group version of
> draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.
>
> Please read and comment. Please send comments to the mpls wg mailing
> list.
>
> The authors think that the draft is stable and plan to request wglc
> after the f2f meeting in Montreal.
>
> /Loa
> fior the co-authors
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>