Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs
Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 May 2013 10:30 UTC
Return-Path: <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2321F942B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b-frwQBApXzv for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B8121F93F0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-gh0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z12so136330ghb.40 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=MGA3G8A5XgeBPVIqwuhS7ifv4SU1dv/NlyepzjIChT0=; b=f+k3nwxY9fU32BekwI8JTYxsPXuWRynrNpKbYSvwOqcjxqSqv7j4ehAnA7AeOyeQ2A dJWrCmQpk4ePErXXPjFmUQ7fj/zLPb/O0m7xnGBwiIVa8uEJziDM8HZ+qMIhVCdP8/uu mFL0mGeyRu8pY+409AXxGO9GAQPyqu3ieXsPLg63ZyRSvqVJNcfRRNWGBbMtZzUaEHax cve4P38Yd5Tmyg4fWS1dys1kefsJ8SlmV+04KkyxhSSzWXJXQbYMK5w5nShTygPtzxoi L4to9skJYe1gCZocAe1219yZiKZCcRRID1nsEIRhhuvyxHy3cBQvYrqT9Tg4vATNhImL opyw==
X-Received: by 10.236.133.97 with SMTP id p61mr15450180yhi.0.1368441038967; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.119.251.254] (mobile-166-147-117-043.mycingular.net. [166.147.117.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p31sm19945828yhm.10.2013.05.13.03.30.38 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2013 03:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
References: <002a01ce4b45$82e38ae0$88aaa0a0$@olddog.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <002a01ce4b45$82e38ae0$88aaa0a0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12BA262D-8402-4E44-B806-F40B8F868642@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B350)
From: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 06:30:35 -0400
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: "<mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:30:44 -0000
Fully support. -sam Sent from my iPhone On May 7, 2013, at 1:08 PM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > ACH TLVs keep popping up and causing Stewart and me trouble. Mainly it is about explaining why no-one actually wants to use them (i.e., when each new ACH Type is defined and has a "No TLVs" written for it, we get asked "why not?"). > > It seems to us that ACH TLVs are an idea that has been rejected. Initially we thought they might be used (especially for identifiers), but there seems to be good opinion that handling generic TLVs would be a pain. > > Since I was heavily responsible for insisting that ACH TLVs were included in RFC 5586, it seems reasonable that I do the work to fix it. > > The I-D below retires ACH TLVs and handles the necessary registry changes. > > Note, of course, that structured data are still possible within individual ACHs if the protocol spec for an individual ACH decides to have them. > > We're directing this work to the MPLS working group because that is where 5586 was written. I have BCC'ed PWE3, L2VPN, and BFD for information. > > Thanks for any comments. > > As humble WG contributors we would be enthusiastic to see early WG adoption and last call :-) > > Thanks, > Adrian > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] >> Sent: 07 May 2013 17:33 >> To: Adrian Farrel; Stewart Bryant >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv- >> 00.txt >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Filename: draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv >> Revision: 00 >> Title: Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS >> Generic Associated Channel >> Creation date: 2013-05-07 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Number of pages: 4 >> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire- >> ach-tlv-00.txt >> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv >> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-00 >> >> >> Abstract: >> The MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) is a generalization of >> the applicability of the Pseudowire (PW) Associated Channel Header >> (ACH). RFC 5586 defines the concept of Type-Length-Variable (TLV) >> constructs that can be carried in messages on the G-ACh by placing >> them in the ACH. >> >> No Associated Channel Type yet defined uses a TLV. Furthermore, it >> is believed that handling TLVs in hardware introduces significant >> problems to the fast-path, and since G-ACh messages are intended to >> be processed substantially in hardware, the use of TLVs in >> undesirable. >> >> This document updates RFC 5586 by retiring ACH TLVs and removing the >> associated registry. >> >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Lizhong Jin
- [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Nitin Bahadur
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Giles Heron
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Dan Frost
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs George Swallow (swallow)
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs David Allan I
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Pablo Frank
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Yaakov Stein
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Eric Gray