Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD
Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 14 April 2022 09:31 UTC
Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06ED3A005D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 02:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbg8JWYjuM8X for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 02:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96963A006A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 02:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KfDgT55sjz67yK4; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:29:25 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) by fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:31:34 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:31:32 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:31:32 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Concerns about ISD
Thread-Index: AdhKc4fdvDv9lzMNTfy5c++8iNI9i///poSA//7GfeCAAt4vgP/7wPiAgAhY2QD//2GkAAAn72wA//7TxPD//eE1gP/7NOOg//aGzID/67yBQP/X6WkA/678jdD/Xfy4gP66v+pQ/XX6mYD66vQNQA==
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:31:32 +0000
Message-ID: <00c748f10ea04d86b32aad5db381173a@huawei.com>
References: <6cc272447d2f4c779e85d5c42d3b3c6c@huawei.com> <8623637D-A32E-47A4-B5FC-4D2CF40BEDD1@tony.li> <6199e0e886f9437c95ef9b70719b00ec@huawei.com> <BCFD3F4A-36D6-47C2-B907-FC40B402F97C@tony.li> <3fb1f261ddff48deb0c2ea083cdbd16f@huawei.com> <6B96F21B-9331-4FA8-AD7B-84A4CA8B6FAB@tony.li> <903c57a48280454091495673ec2fe275@huawei.com> <BD5C1BE7-4633-4B51-BAC1-B2AE1C537F36@tony.li> <ad6b8c42b0aa4880b9dee02516f5e46f@huawei.com> <F5BB2CEB-CC8C-4E71-A2E7-B4212878C3B1@tony.li> <aa9c4b913d844410b2af90c8db78c194@huawei.com> <BY3PR05MB8081937B52E657713E8293BFC7ED9@BY3PR05MB8081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <a29c96be774845e582a66700d2264f7b@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmXtz1bDE+_YifueKoHg-ji=24rQGc9+LUESMnZL4cz4dg@mail.gmail.com> <26b4c2ab395c42c7be780ed1e6dc67dd@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmUg+S8MQ=i+zD31F03=Nn4YQ_x+A=YKxNDgmpmMBXSR0g@mail.gmail.com> <907c9a6c49704a77a607a98b7657f0b3@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmXHz+QnLXOg5MXe12-gLYhSmccgCW+PYQy3K6cu+yAj8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXHz+QnLXOg5MXe12-gLYhSmccgCW+PYQy3K6cu+yAj8A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_00c748f10ea04d86b32aad5db381173ahuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/H8fiQL84DIX6PZtB69d-m_H0lwI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:31:45 -0000
Hi Greg, My evaluation is based on existing drafts. I did not see the balance point from: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kompella-mpls-mspl4fa/ which kept pushing the WG for adoption. Best, Tianran From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 10:06 AM To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>; Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>; mpls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Hi Tianran, I appreciate you've shared your point of view. I have offered mine. Simply put it "It depends". And yes, I believe that we're still discussing the MPLS data plane and the impact MNA may have. As for the philosophical aspect, I believe that we'll find a balance between new capabilities and the pain/cost inflicted through an open technical discussion. Regards, Greg On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:50 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Greg, Your statement is floating in the area. I am confused. You asked me some questions on specific use cases. I replied with my point with reason. But here you jumped to some other things, like a philosophy thing. What’s your thoughts on my reply on each of you question? If you disagree, what’s your proposal and how does it work better? If you want to discuss PW, I would like to know firstly the use cases. Signaling or data traffic? How ISD is more flexible? Best, Tianran From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 10:44 PM To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>> Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>>; Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>>; mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Hi Tianran, thank you for sharing your thoughts. Of course, there's no way to slice the bread and whether to use only PSD comes with its limitations like burning a value for the first nibble after the BoS. And it needs to interwork with PW CW and ACH/G-ACH. I see an ISD-based solution as more flexible and easier to apply to MPLS PWs. Regards, Greg On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:16 AM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Greg, Please see my thoughts in line. Cheers, Tianran From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 10:10 AM To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>> Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>>; Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>>; mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Hi Tianran, I have got several questions based on the discussion we had of the use cases and hope you could share your opinion: * Do you see a benefit of supporting EL using NMA? If EL is supported by NMA, should it be in ISD or PSD? ZTR> I do not see the “benefit”. I think EL is a mature thing, already implemented everywhere. There is no need to duplicate. * If NMA supports GISS, where do you see it - ISD or PSD? ZTR> I will use PSD to support slicing, as this one: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-mpls-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-02. * If NMA to support IOAM in MPLS be only Preallocated Trace Option and Direct Export types, would you consider carrying the IOAM Header in ISD? ZTR> I am not going to use ISD for IOAM. At first look, IOAM data format is already specified. I do not see how to encode into ISD, with inconsecutive space(S bit in between). Regards, Greg On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 6:17 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Hi, Comments in line. Tianran Juniper Business Use Only From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 2:36 AM To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> Cc: mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Tony, >>Pushing data to PSD and beyond the RLSD will cause systems to be excluded from the path or take a significant performance hit. If I know the RLSD of each node, there are many ways to prevent some nodes from pushing data to PSD. [JD] Given that you *only* want to use PSD, what is the above sentence proposing? ZTR> If you followed the past few emails, Tony misled people that PSD will hinder the interoperability. I just show you how PSD will not. According to your description below on the ISD process, it’s the same as PSD somehow. I did not see the ISD advantage. I would like to know how ISD could survive if the ISD exceed the RLSD? [JD] The correct term is Network Actions Sub-stack (NAS). To answer your question, a transit node will miss the NAS regardless of whether it contains in-stack data. This is the point that Tony has been making for the past few email iterations ZTR> Creating new terms does not help the community. I do not care the fancy term you created. Could you please point me out how many times Tony has clarified the ISD process? And where they are? I may have missed. In my brain, Tony did not address any of my concerns on ISD, but only kept ignoring the fact I presented. It’s not a good way for technique discussion. Best, Tianran From: Tony Li [mailto:tony1athome@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 2:03 PM To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>> Cc: mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Hi Tianran, ZTR2> PSD can work with RLSD, I cannot see how it will hinder the interoperability. Pushing data to PSD and beyond the RLSD will cause systems to be excluded from the path or take a significant performance hit. Tony _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD Tianran Zhou