[mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 11 September 2015 17:06 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069231B5054; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oGdxuaNiVtER; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C1F1B5058; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150911170625.2060.89492.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:06:25 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/HmSauw7rCS0KgPfiiLibLzHUBy4>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:06:27 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping' <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-09-25. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract In some inter autonomous system (AS) and inter-area deployment scenarios for RFC 4379 "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute", a replying Label Switching Router (LSR) may not have the available route to an initiator, and the Echo Reply message sent to the initiator would be discarded resulting in false negatives or complete failure of operation of LSP Ping and Traceroute. This document describes extensions to LSP Ping mechanism to enable the replying LSR to have the capability to relay the Echo Response by a set of routable intermediate nodes to the initiator. This document updates RFC 4379. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/ballot/ The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1945/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/828/
- [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay… The IESG
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-r… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-r… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-r… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-r… Andrew G. Malis