Re: [mpls] WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA710129B28; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id np15K37EV5lK; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6395E1293FD; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w10so241983399oif.0; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OdL7syrtXb2+0GCFVpbEOjgXi3gz4BRlyFD6zG0rkCk=; b=BDklVeegeKI84fV3k5uA3UaR4eCKTnIzFhtvhtGs3h9+Hos7iCiMo6o2lg8uV6CwzK 2mcbFZtLsLwoxGrml+O2FVfK7GXE7kMZpiRiYkPOA9udrSVm+xJ4X+9fPTJNHPPvr4RW /ZfFSFdkbpMikjAqfDYu8OA3Ih2RDm1gwM9Hnzp3mrKOGbi7+Ho60F+BA1qLsAwMEOH2 Gzvz3susKlheWCV8fQFr+QbzG/DG7X94TXFKpLLy0tiC0DC5WCpWEVF6FF4FRohlOBT6 kTRkzwUGHOO9VMC5EYap9B/HWkZL1oW07eoKtJ8GPNXC6cgQekL12wDcLs4Ks/1GqXGp n4QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OdL7syrtXb2+0GCFVpbEOjgXi3gz4BRlyFD6zG0rkCk=; b=B6hMEYSt4dOKpNSJZKd1eBmgcENBO4TG5CpNGkHUps6wMuOg1J9xf8Vg5k0EYdspVM izlyfcxbTQvlOOoM4WlRiSWUmjlb8gloEC1tNXkV848BYUJ1WJAg74NT+dvFZtynE9hl sPv9aVVd2z24SRRaOuBsgkRtQ+KJfqbJ1C9hNCTTo5yjWGVKxphBmaORdi+UeXMv/DYp FRLelySVLnOgBEhzH7Apdk19Dv86Pm8SHNpgNyH+/X/D8wqGGyvVA77s1j80J8JGXT2F ftmOy9kKht9C6GMvURZK3JajFOGLo78l6+zTM5pMIeUCjlprXFbMsbSGGkI2xRKJeBef TEMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDXf0FkXRyu2Gc1UgpYAAWnxfouTc9iIepAljHfEajx7/7mfNbk dga4G7yMH/G8Xa03fXZ50aTZ3idU1KTy
X-Received: by 10.157.82.87 with SMTP id q23mr4278032otg.52.1495632933753; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.52.246 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <db3adc45477f4e44ac48f1fb449a1850@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <db3adc45477f4e44ac48f1fb449a1850@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:35:33 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXHZL2oJNAgApqzXM66mDYwb1QLFcBHzXtC4RhHiCZ4vQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "n.leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043c4becbb19110550452d37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Hrtvk5R5BFreRRCWbcuVRDRtzyo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:35:36 -0000

Support as co-author

The question whether the  previously disclosed IPR is applicable to the
current version of the draft, in my view, should be evaluated by the holder
of the IPR. To the best of my understanding, the IPR is not applicable.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:33 PM, <N.Leymann@telekom.de>; wrote:

> Dear Working Group,
>
> The authors have updated draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed and think that the
> draft is ready for WGLC.
> Therefore this e-mail starts a WG LC which will end on the 7th of June.
>
> Please note that draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed did not pass the
> previous working group last call, because of an IPR disclosure:
>
>   *https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2892/*
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2892/>
>
> The authors have updated the draft and they believe that the IPR is no
> longer in scope.
> Please notify the list if you still think the IPR is an issue and please
> state if you think it
> is OK to continue with the publication of this document.
>
>   Best regards
>
>     Nic
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>