Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
"Puneet Agarwal" <pagarwal@broadcom.com> Mon, 17 December 2012 20:19 UTC
Return-Path: <pagarwal@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED89B21F889C for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:19:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qiah0473FM-n for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:19:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mms1.broadcom.com (mms1.broadcom.com [216.31.210.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5ED21F8897 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.192.232] by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:17:03 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 06151B78-6688-425E-9DE2-57CB27892261
Received: from SJEXCHCAS04.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.11) by SJEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.192.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.247.2; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:15:15 -0800
Received: from SJEXCHMB06.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [fe80::65ea:1de7:41c4:e948]) by SJEXCHCAS04.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:14:54 -0800
From: Puneet Agarwal <pagarwal@broadcom.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: AQHN2dmXWIJe6YiHWk+Hqx5OR02XuZgdccKw
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:14:53 +0000
Message-ID: <BA343C7BA78ED743B8A5E83749F7B1C21BE84398@SJEXCHMB06.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <50CAEAD4.6000705@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <50CAEAD4.6000705@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.16.203.100]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 7CD1A235218433189-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:19:13 -0000
I do not support this draft. There are already solutions under consideration in nvo3 (vxlan and nvgre) - do not see the need another solution. Thanks. -Puneet -----Original Message----- From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 1:01 AM To: mpls@ietf.org; draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Martin Vigoureux Subject: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document Working group, This is to start a "two week" poll on adopting draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06 as an MPLS working group document. Due to the holiday season this poll has been extended with one week. Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org) Please give an technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document. This poll ends January 07, 2013. There is one IPR claim against this document - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1941/ . All the active co-authors has stated on the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other IPR claims than those already disclosed. However, up to version -03 (the document that we used for the IPR poll) Marshall Eubanks was listed as one of the authors. Marshall has discontinued all interactions with the IETF, including the author team of draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06. The working group chairs has tried to contact Marshall by other means, to try get a response on the IPR poll. We have had no success in this. From version -04 the authors decided to remove Marshall as a co-author. /Loa (mpls wg co-chair) -- Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 +46 767 72 92 13 _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make dra… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Vivek Kumar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Nischal Sheth
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Puneet Agarwal
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Rogers, Josh
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS over U… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Adrian Farrel
- [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlying n… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS ov… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- [mpls] MPLS over L2TP over UDP//re: poll to see i… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- [mpls] Poll ended - poll to see if we have suppor… Loa Andersson