Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067C012D50E; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oiZQcPfNTlhK; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4280512D0D1; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id a136so11913657wme.0; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LAn6nXf0kjDcrPJUIBg6pme/9pbkvyRPvNtCkzVB0fM=; b=z/DBeqTGK+C+IvuEcnRSNKiCaEWK8g+i9KoYb+T8WtXLuXA/7ljWIMBMmYISzOeIUC yQmqdIYRKa1gbX2EaSNR/DRCUH2JQP0wMej7II2WryJHGbvjjrRIjdgqsTavm9tYvpwm ui/+it/Ps1BicePYQxsDXVf4ZlK1XlERC4x8dhx591DrfEdjReu+HVYcphRwpgXGC8ro PaPDannWF0K6aVfXGuSI0T44vBvYBprsWqT8RrA0DDEL9D4XDpp4VxQ+fq3m7QdsmJmc rfcwBpu7A5xumXpnryxArVF2z+vV1/ZIjXglkZ7VDfKGNFTGKCSB+5L2kZl2fSTUb/5g z2Cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LAn6nXf0kjDcrPJUIBg6pme/9pbkvyRPvNtCkzVB0fM=; b=UetAgej8lroLALXTeV6LkThlyXEUWwbslmUBq4Pco9IMfOdJjPgPuI/H4yTR47LCNZ 5n5NZGXiMfj4n+jR7L5WxoiJkzik96oMcAd3kWnO977lN6zQNSe4ZpO6F95KAH9kniQ7 clxz4gmZtFe4Wz13HpZxwdXi0Z99VVyWdQuxILoQLGjjnxDMRHHzTvzgBDBd/R5PszOu Q+qlchscTxp5WiAwHT+tFRCATAoegZWf2LxM42wj7zZsKrh5629hpHn17qNSsiNpCTn3 HjX/FPlyXY6SS33Eju0tPCv2655YUa9YqPZsJQVOrdswy2wOkHvXQpcda6YyQkZfOF13 3oHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJRmTaKXLLMtD7/oTFaeBButgnQA9P5jPK+UkgA/98zb4tqNARQuFefP4d9E/bTRg==
X-Received: by 10.194.150.130 with SMTP id ui2mr5070280wjb.11.1464986156800; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a195sm1241065wma.2.2016.06.03.13.35.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jun 2016 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5751EA2A.7050701@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 22:35:54 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/IIktKAL95uNiczm4l7M3oYuWBfw>
Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 20:36:00 -0000

Hello Loa,

After separating the original draft into two drafts
I support adoption of the two drafts.

Cheers,
Huub.



 > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-
> yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group
> documents.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has
> been started in parallel to this adoption poll
>
> The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR
> poll has concluded.
>
> /Loa
>
> MPLS wg co-chair.


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...