IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EFD3A10FC; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:29:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmSlCxxcaYsQ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9C03A10F0; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id r7so959168wrc.5; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:29:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=7P3iuG66WvmS5P4dFECgehgee6KI1RusWPHAkcqgo8A=; b=tHIV1vI6SArYATR7X3kzaitxdPrKrOJcUp9Y9l0vh1sD5zvUeESdTB8Dya2RDMBPS9 oGWyGkZ8SWuPXvQVDntXmaPBcsTlRcJ9PUR/ZQC8dFY4wNJtUHane2cx0Ms7+T/VYfui S39dVbsDK4OZAWmJ78uAAD3dqM2HD+qtDHNSNGX9Wqg83+n9QYyBY78vVMX9pc54ANHN BT8E5dLsro89cVl98zxa8dk/1lrB3eCAYW6+6Vt38ITlL1p3yxLGSFBOkzF+zq5ID1DG rZ3ozVpZtCyOJnIYsVhdulkr/RY/QAlbsgE2vLo+hZ7NmOdiqBV4WtUq/t99s2Hg1gCV u27g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=7P3iuG66WvmS5P4dFECgehgee6KI1RusWPHAkcqgo8A=; b=e1zBn56kODiqgu/C0uCNTYqRgUr0vSDfoKWcjAL1lg9oydi34KrsQ6YtgCwEJuAuKW 8QeDfC5oz08eVJAI9GXPDnoZDus0AIG+X4ngWYk2ghdc+MXukRBYpr8L9GgcVuAiNOKr CCQeVEUhPvzO9T7lZkEoJC888b3tusj5j8rD64uiBjPJmNl8fVGq06TMybRqcC3rTRdv 567kLrnfrPi7UspNI7iD2YgNHNx6iYI4iwo+fgXI6frJACr512MaBRI5miAAYX+X0fyo Muo/7MDJIP7Sm51mYwglWH3sny6FXXpBS1D4+94hs5g7MFhW8FVzss+Yhp8Nv8vO8fYy EBDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YKTF2l+3IB2bPCkbthe1En/3Z5R517uzagVl+L8zZ5YTHOuoY GaRW7ijqUXdRJj1bAuegpvLslR1Fi9BOjA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFZGBJ6QxVhevScH6oH4eIwTm1DSW0eKKPfaxD2AKIFlgERrj0Z9UwhxeRx53zlLtaDFBZcw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd41:: with SMTP id h1mr643977wrs.284.1610393370533; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:23c5:3395:c901:c9c:da9c:6c4b:8980? ([2a00:23c5:3395:c901:c9c:da9c:6c4b:8980]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h9sm430569wme.11.2021.01.11.11.29.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE2980E847D@dggeml530-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:29:28 +0000
Cc: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr@ietf.org
Message-Id: <31E0C5A4-1EA3-486F-8BC4-E4E9AA107D95@gmail.com>
References: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE2980E847D@dggeml530-mbs.china.huawei.com>
To: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18C66)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/IkGqKl2qTr89GEYPBAlcQsKq4PY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:29:34 -0000

I have a slightly more fundamental question.

Why are we specifying this for sr?

Surely we should specify it for MPLS  and have SR inherit that?

Also what happens if the MPLS payload is a PW or Detnet or something else defined to be immediately below the bottom label?

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email