IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 30 December 2020 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6133A0EC6; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 20:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQc0SyuyAajR; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 20:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498DB3A0EBB; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 20:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.17.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87A7D322D68; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 05:12:43 +0100 (CET)
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr@ietf.org" <draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr@ietf.org>
References: <CAA=duU21PHQoJP0cEX6o1K=EwUFqeH19YvcDPNJVKE9c2szS6w@mail.gmail.com> <46b1b623-a628-2373-4378-e70f0038b4f2@pi.nu> <AM7PR07MB6248A6E61A831729A24EF720A0D90@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <508b5ef1-6958-ae84-1c81-f0cfe0c054d3@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:12:38 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB6248A6E61A831729A24EF720A0D90@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/J4exjoUQNMStq_lfId4AGFxay3Y>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 04:12:50 -0000

Tom, et.al,

On 28/12/2020 20:56, tom petch wrote:
> However, I'd like to see more discussion on what we should do. In
> particular I'd like to see a comment from the authors on this.
> 
> <tp>
> 
> Why not use ACH?

I don't think there is anything in the thread the says "don't use ACH", 
what I want is just to tie up the last lose ends before going to decision.

/Loa
> 
> Tom Petch

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status