Re: [mpls] MPLS WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Nic, Adrian,

Already when  I wrote the text that is now in the document, I was aware 
of that we would have to change that sentenc as we got closer to
requesting publication.

I think the proposed text by Adrian might be it.

/Loa

PS

I'm also a co-authors so no surprise that I support progressing this
document



On 05/03/2020 03:20, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Ooops,
> 
> NEW
>     At the time of writing the first version of this document
> END
> 
> Thanks, Acee.
> 
> Adrian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 04 March 2020 16:00
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: MPLS WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
> 
> Nic,
> 
> I'm an author, I support its publication, no one is surprised.
> 
> I'd like to make a change in the Introduction
> OLD
>     At the time of posting this Internet-Draft
> NEW
>     At the time of writing at the first version of this document
> END
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 04 March 2020 15:45
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: MPLS WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.
> 
> Please send your comments to the MPLS WG mailing list
> (mailto:[e-mail]).
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology.
> 
> Both the authors and the contributors have stated on the working group
> mailing list that they are unaware of any non-disclosed IPRs that relates to
> this document.
> 
> This working group last call ends March 19, 2020.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Nic
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]