[mpls] Fwd: Early allocation of code points for draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

IANA,

The MPLS working group request early allocation of code points for 
draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam according to the description below.

If easible the three lowest free values should be allocated.

/Loa

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Early allocation of code points for draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 00:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: [e-mail]
Resent-To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], 
[e-mail]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:31:26 +0200
From: Martin Vigoureux <[e-mail]>
To: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], Shraddha Hegde 
<[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail] 
<[e-mail]>, [e-mail] 
<[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>

Hello Loa,

thank you. I approve.

-m

Le 2021-05-06 à 9:56, Loa Andersson a écrit :
> Martin,
> 
> This is the process for early allocations of IANA codepoints as
> described in RFC 7120. The comments preceded with (-) are mine
> describing how the draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam meet the requirements for 
> early allocation,
> 
>    1.  The authors (editors) of the document submit a request for early
>        allocation to the Working Group chairs, specifying which code
>        points require early allocation and to which document they should
>        be assigned.
> 
>        - The document is stable and implementations are under way.
> 
>        - working group chairs are prepared to go ahead and request the
>          earlly allocations.
> 
>    2.  The WG chairs determine whether the conditions for early
>        allocations described in Section 2 are met, particularly
>        conditions (c) and (d).
> 
>       - the working group chairs has reviewed the draft in the light
>         of section 2 of RFC 7120.
> 
>       - the wg chairs are convinced that draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam meet
>         all the criteria listed in section 2 of RFC 7120.
> 
>    3.  The WG chairs gauge whether there is consensus within the WG that
>        early allocation is appropriate for the given document.
> 
>        - the wg chairs are convinced that there are consensus in the wg
>          to go ahead and do the early allocation.
> 
>    4.  If steps 2) and 3) are satisfied, the WG chairs request approval
>        from the Area Director(s).  The Area Director(s) may apply
>        judgement to the request, especially if there is a risk of
>        registry depletion.
> 
>        - This mail is the request according to step four in the process
>          for early allocation according to the IANA section of
>          draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam.
> 
>        - the mail is sent to Martin Vigoureux as responsible AD, with a
>          copy to the the other rtg-ads.
> 
>        - we request support for early allocation of the codes as
>          requested in IANA considerations sectio in
>          draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam, i.e.:
>          Three new Target FEC stack sub-TLVs from the "Sub-TLVs for TLV
>          types 1,16 and 21" subregistry in the "TLVs" registry of the
>          "Multi-Protocol Label switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths
>          (LSPs) Ping parameters" namespace.
> 
>          -- PeerAdj SID Sub-TLV : TBD1
> 
>          -- PeerNode SID Sub-TLV: TBD2
> 
>          -- PeerSet SID Sub-TLV : TBD3
> 
>        - we will wait for the response from the responsible AD before
>          going ahead with step 5 in this process.
> 
>    5.  If the Area Directors approve step 4), the WG chairs request IANA
>        to make an early allocation.
> 
>    6.  IANA makes an allocation from the appropriate registry, marking
>        it as "Temporary", valid for a period of one year from the date
>        of allocation.  The date of first allocation and the date of
>        expiry are also recorded in the registry and made visible to the
>        public.
> 
> 
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg co-chairs.

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]