Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86F112049B; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCO1qQ7_VQ2H; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7089120013; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E8682C2A72C2F744D42E; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:04:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.38) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:04:37 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.113]) by DGGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::fca6:7568:4ee3:c776%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:04:31 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Benjamin Kaduk' <kaduk@mit.edu>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU1fmbThhWFHA7EEKjBTDftquDOKYI0X+wgAEpCwCAALQIUIAcWr2AgAE3zUCAAH6WAIABZtCw
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:04:31 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE292990D6D@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <155208210011.3264.12148702952456660789.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE2928FABB2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAMMESswBNuY2y6dQsdy=zL6k8kpYG3CJ4N5oEwtZgBTAnLpTDg@mail.gmail.com> <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE2928FD2A8@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAMMESszK8ozAXBVy3PDY2A8Ymb3jF7NuBR6gvQ8xLbpS1a+WEw@mail.gmail.com> <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE29298896E@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAMMESsxPVCUpFEtDquv=UH7O=ZeOKWBE38J4OhbgmFw31MZhqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxPVCUpFEtDquv=UH7O=ZeOKWBE38J4OhbgmFw31MZhqw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.194.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE292990D6Ddggeml510mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/JgbEOLlk0mOzx8jM1RlAH7K8QcM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 07:04:43 -0000

Sounds great!

This also should address Benjamin’s DISCUSS.

I have uploaded a revision, here are the links:

Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath

Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-07

Thanks,
Mach

From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 1:24 AM
To: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>;
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)

Yes, that works for me.  If we do that, we don’t need the reference to rfc8029. :-)


On April 1, 2019 at 10:42:27 PM, Mach Chen (mach.chen@huawei.com<mailto:mach.chen@huawei.com>) wrote:

How about just remove the mandatory/optional, not to emphasize whether it is mandatory or optional, then it may reduce some confusion when others read it in the future,   just as the “Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV” does,  :

   This document defines a new TLV (RFC8029, Section 3) which is

   referred to as the "LSR Capability TLV.  It MAY be included…