[mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8577 (5743)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 May 2019 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FC212007A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 21:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQ1rAlkB9o0k for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 21:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F7A12004F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 21:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0476BB8211C; Wed, 29 May 2019 21:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: harish.ietf@gmail.com, vbeeram@juniper.net, tejal.parikh@verizon.com, tsaad.net@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: vishnupavan@gmail.com, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20190530045133.0476BB8211C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 21:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/JinNkPDpKII5LBTwZR1raBwN4ag>
Subject: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8577 (5743)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 04:51:38 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8577,
"Signaling RSVP-TE Tunnels on a Shared MPLS Forwarding Plane".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5743

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>;

Section: 11.3

Original Text
-------------
   IANA manages the "Record Route Object Sub-object Flags" registry as
   part of the "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
   TE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
   rsvp-te-parameters>.  Prior to this document, this registry did not
   include Label Sub-object Flags.  This document creates the addition
   of a new subregistry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.

      Flag  Name                    Reference

      0x1   Global Label            [RFC3209]
      0x02  TE Link Label           [RFC8577], Section 9.3
      0x04  Delegation Label        [RFC8577], Section 9.5


Corrected Text
--------------
   IANA manages the "Record Route Object Sub-object Flags" registry as
   part of the "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
   TE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
   rsvp-te-parameters>.  Prior to this document, this registry did not
   include Label Sub-object Flags.  This document creates the addition
   of a new subregistry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.

      Flag  Name                    Reference

      0x1   Global Label            [RFC3209]
      0x02  TE Link Label           [RFC8577], Section 9.3
      0x04  Delegation Label        [RFC8577], Section 9.5
 
  All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via
  Standards Action.

Notes
-----
This errata is being reported as a response to the following email from IANA.

**
Authors/WG Chairs/ADs for RFC 8577,

During the publication process, the registration procedures were unintentionally removed from the document.  Is this something that an errata should be submitted for?

In version 9 of the document, it says: All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via Standards Action.	

In the published RFC this sentence does not appear to be there.

Please advise.

Thank you,

Michelle Cotton
Protocol Parameters Engagement Sr. Manager

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8577 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Signaling RSVP-TE Tunnels on a Shared MPLS Forwarding Plane
Publication Date    : April 2019
Author(s)           : H. Sitaraman, V. Beeram, T. Parikh, T. Saad
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG