IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Thu, 19 May 2016 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E1112DAEC; Thu, 19 May 2016 10:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QK6H9rjDF1FB; Thu, 19 May 2016 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62E4A12DACE; Thu, 19 May 2016 10:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1292; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463678188; x=1464887788; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=eSjNtKyFnjxLfh4E6xcXJD0UPEfN+8fjD76Ki9H1S50=; b=R2ajTQQFSI+RSeQKl78kP0j4qiIdv/lXCyYT8tDhI/dghSBpTMzsxuTA xupeY9rTJwxxXEsCv3n1Wen4azJokml7KiGnNgQEHcmQKBG7ePvLnf9Gu gAOjEwI2ndXG2BlUnkNRA9PdjtlIrAoShQGtS8TlCv7c71HwQUXEBXobm o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AqAgAU9D1X/5NdJa1egzdWfga6BQENgXUXC4RfgRCBPDgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEMBAQQBAQFoAwsOBAEIGEkMCycEAQ0FiC8OxCIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQUFhiCETYQREQGFWRwFmDEBjh+BaYRPiGKPSAEeAQFCgjiBNW6GUTZ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,334,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="104346706"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2016 17:16:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4JHGQUd030590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 May 2016 17:16:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:16:26 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 19 May 2016 13:16:25 -0400
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsfIss9L+0QqPnU+2tRr8MfM62w==
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:16:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D3636CF5.17939F%zali@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.163]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <3727628339D6CD48927790DCAF79F4EA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Jnu3h7Sct0K3sksnSqgrmQlK1Dg>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:16:32 -0000

Hi- 

I support adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-yang-03 and
draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group documents.

Thanks

Regards Š Zafar



>
>On 2016-05-18 6:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>
>>
>>Working Group,
>>
>>This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-
>>yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group
>>documents.
>>
>>Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>>group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical
>>motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>>the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>>
>>There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has
>>been started in parallel to this adoption poll
>>
>>The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR
>>poll has concluded.
>>
>>/Loa
>>
>>MPLS wg co-chair.
>>-- 
>>
>>
>>Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>>Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>mpls@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status