[mpls] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Xiao Min,
thank you for your comments and help in improving this draft; much
appreciated. Will upload the updated version shortly.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 6:16 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
>
> Thank you for the prompt reply.
>
> Please see inline.
> Original
> *From: *GregMirsky <[e-mail]>
> *To: *肖敏10093570;
> *Cc: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> *Date: *2024年06月12日 23:45
> *Subject: **Re: [mpls] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases*
> Hi Xiao Min,
> thank you for your support of this work; much appreciated. Please find my
> notes below tagged GIM>>.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:53 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> I support progressing this draft to publication.
>>
>>
>> Two small comments as below for the authors to consider.
>>
>> One is on Section 2.2.1 In-situ OAM, IOAM Trace Options include only
>> Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace, and other types of IOAM Option
>> are not IOAM Trace Options.
>>
> GIM>> You are correct. These are all IOAM Option Types. I propose the
> following editorial update:
> OLD TEXT:
>    Several IOAM Trace Options have been defined:
>    *  Pre-allocated and Incremental
>    *  Edge-to-Edge
>    *  Proof-of-Transit
>    *  Direct Export (DEX)
>  NEW TEXT:
>    Several IOAM Option-Types have been defined:
>    *  Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace
>    *  Edge-to-Edge
>    *  Proof-of-Transit
>    *  Direct Export (DEX)
>
> Would that update address your concern?
>
> [XM]>>> This update looks good to me. And one more update might be needed,
> s/In all IOAM Trace Options except for the Direct Export/In all IOAM
> Option-Types except for the Direct Export.
>
>
> Another one is on Section 2.2.2 Alternate Marking Method, I would be happy
>> if a reference to draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation can be added.
>>
> GIM>> In the course of the discussions, it appears to me that the group
> agreed to concentrate on the method that can be realized using MNA, not on
> an example of implementation in the MPLS network. WDYT?
>
> [XM]>>> I can live with it without that reference. :-)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Xiao Min
>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Xiao Min
>> Original
>> *From: *TonyLi <[e-mail]>
>> *To: *mpls <[e-mail]>;
>> *Cc: *mpls-chairs <[e-mail]>;
>> *Date: *2024年06月05日 06:26
>> *Subject: **[mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases*
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
>> [WG chair hat: on]
>>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> This starts a 2 week working group last call
>> on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases (
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases/)
>>
>> This WGLC will expire at 4pm PDT, Jun 18, 2024.
>>
>> Please comment as to the readiness of this document for publication, both
>> pro and con.
>>
>> There are no IPR filings against this document.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
>
>