IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 27 August 2024 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A4CC14F71F; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.756
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RWOPevT2LJW; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB557C14F602; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-714226888dfso4633574b3a.1; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724741859; x=1725346659; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DnEPGYSv1fqNWFqXlNCCSTof03UCdSQWyAJFMmkVPPI=; b=fmfYGnsNTFp+MwUszajOi9PQuDKWdeYmOfpZLyxDkdFjyzHNEiUa7mcIc+KBpO08y3 ia7wDnINBwQsSez6IkBeoQIMtbwRp95pPUDCXNAVhm/RRIbgtTYIYVJcsYTBntUQ2x3T 1WZCYAUwNq4eI9zXhxieAW0JiZs+IWzsAllgAY61gZ0Yw7Lcb9/d0msMq3T4x5ibpbmj ry+q0t3fCNsmolY+wMYRNFGIGMmi38ow5NknuK/eZLN65IbuxfAuWC1rMT8osh5Yv16i 0wldKfaY/82WHO3gpFMJXZzHjKLZjRCxL6qr4xiak5VOOx11O3pE59xC0dgFaGowaqwu Omgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724741859; x=1725346659; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DnEPGYSv1fqNWFqXlNCCSTof03UCdSQWyAJFMmkVPPI=; b=obo3e4wfnFaKVpuxIQxhoAtVwIdL4iN0XbLkcUrrJIDgpD5tdOQsz3k5qWtEHUy76Z GSANVOUtk2tBsT/nXZ/nFx6xWkizNcRW43yVaXt9Rlut7wpqrVQtMnuiv/OX+4B/7ig4 X+yiGpoxiNvyNxpgtVOSbLAZqT/EhkCg0c2X2RgFcFg7XtfGCrk10Hrk3cgpbd5hhtek r6ZzwkvTq1Ps6rh9P8+u9PVqDbel5cUX9RM/z173X8bBQL3l5MyfRt0HiIyVirPP8wKI +4WEscjz62lju1epoNuGWOF1jCKtTq1PCmLwiJjgAr/qZBiDTLmyLmVR3w0J7nzn89y6 6G0w==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUKBFkrTg8EjzVSGg+loZtZsBzdtDmwlKEneJyHsooEdLLepLlgv6uHbY2PJZez9/D4gvFGbHpZHhNxzA==@ietf.org, AJvYcCX/Ibz5bZNjRbhtHH4Wo6bFctucWH1XJHsTSe9tTVlLRygXj9PH2LkbpFD5/gSD5WpHKCo2gA==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7jd10Wr1HNyIOpWg8wGhvLT3KjGtsmLp9YVF5fX+wvMhyGhHR +ZPO91TY9GscWkm7dWk80iszmBB2iSYQbzGz9mXrVXFnGuJiy429
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFMlcPzMlFPuwYib955nCboj/QdNIKsPD/3k/j3GNd+J6JGW7Z9u5dCPndDjE2dhdwjHNDZiQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:a34c:b0:1c4:e0d3:9637 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1cc8a084843mr16043369637.52.1724741858995; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d5ebbb0b1asm14440193a91.38.2024.08.26.23.57.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <e0cba21d-2435-46e5-8c16-127afb63000e@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 23:57:27 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AF0D0358-04FB-47C0-AEF6-C652322BC870@tony.li>
References: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li> <DS0PR19MB6501C2C805B65C532B46263FFC872@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <71045c16-caa6-4875-a2c4-c50d0484eda1@pi.nu> <393bd232-bac1-44c6-9cae-3c087bd692c7@pi.nu> <AA32CC75-78DF-4B1F-95F1-ECA76FDC2686@tony.li> <afd92389-fec9-4213-b7e7-3d565c702e7e@pi.nu> <3FC93687-AB1C-4DBD-8800-811E7564A807@tony.li> <e0cba21d-2435-46e5-8c16-127afb63000e@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
Message-ID-Hash: 4DKHMZS5FJ2OTESDUIB4GVDJGHFNVE5A
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4DKHMZS5FJ2OTESDUIB4GVDJGHFNVE5A
X-MailFrom: tony1athome@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/JrxcMeTOAPKrrZOsDJgiV7AKTPM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Loa,

Calling consensus without actually polling the group could very easily be incorrect.

Tony


> On Aug 26, 2024, at 11:50 PM, Loa Andersson - loa at pi.nu <mailforwards@cloudmails.net> wrote:
> 
> Tony,
> 
> It would be hard to imagine consensus without interest, however with the strong interest documented in the poll it would be easy to call consensus.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> Den 26/08/2024 kl. 22:26, skrev Tony Li:
>> Loa,
>> 
>> Interest is not consensus.
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 25, 2024, at 4:59 AM, Loa Andersson - loa at pi.nu <mailforwards@cloudmails.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Tony,
>>> 
>>> It seem to me that the decision you are looking for are moot, the poll you started indicate a strong interest in implementing "the IOAM passport method with the Pre-allocated option defined in RFC 9197" and the "post card method with direct-export option" as described in RFC 9326. This can hardly be done without PSD.
>>> 
>>> /Loa
>>> 
>>> Den 19/08/2024 kl. 23:09, skrev Tony Li:
>>>> I am trying to make progress in a step-wise fashion.
>>>> 
>>>> Before doing a WGAP on that document, it would make sense for the WG to decide whether or not it needs a PSD solution.
>>> -- 
>>> Loa Andersson
>>> Senior MPLS Expert
>>> Bronze Dragon Consulting
>>> loa@pi.nu
>>> loa.pi.nu.@gmail.com
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> Loa Andersson
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting
> loa@pi.nu
> loa.pi.nu.@gmail.com
>

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status