IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Sun, 29 September 2024 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260DBC14F6A9; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jbz5wglP4X52; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D89DC14F5FC; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XH13F6X8hz6K6h2; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:42:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.162.219]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939CF140A79; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:43:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemf500006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.244) by lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:43:35 +0100
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.221) by kwepemf500006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:43:33 +0800
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) by kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:43:33 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)
Thread-Index: AQHbDoUwKFW6ojt28kyIJnukrZbcFLJpvwyAgAD84/CAAwAlgIAACnkAgACEz4CAACZagIABAzlA
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 23:43:33 +0000
Message-ID: <7390a29e261f4728a31e6984240efdab@huawei.com>
References: <DS0PR19MB65014515D511B396E79BA36FFCF82@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <LV8P220MB1914BBB4896362040615CAB2FC6F2@LV8P220MB1914.NAMP220.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <5f5db9a20d8e4b47b5515b686e834227@huawei.com> <4819c3baa7bd4bff81babbd913db2227@huawei.com> <DM6PR11MB46922AC760C358D172A6A4B7DE752@DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <452FDD29-F8A9-417A-8BC6-B16721385AEC@tony.li> <DM6PR11MB46923BEAA8216EFBE0545290DE752@DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2AEEDFE6-230A-4A19-BF5E-3B9AC34B5603@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <2AEEDFE6-230A-4A19-BF5E-3B9AC34B5603@tony.li>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.118]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7390a29e261f4728a31e6984240efdabhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: AY4HUTE6QDR3Z5ZOFFCDDX2RVI5RNDG4
X-Message-ID-Hash: AY4HUTE6QDR3Z5ZOFFCDDX2RVI5RNDG4
X-MailFrom: zhoutianran@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/JtHTzhbKO7ZjbmAuo07w2vcgEcw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

The IPR poll for the two document did not hit the point.
The point is how can the MNA mechanism disable the ISD and use PSD only.
The draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr need to resolve this.

Tianran

From: Tony Li [mailto:tony1athome@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 12:13 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <zali@cisco.com>
Cc: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>; mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)


Hi Zafar,

I am aware of the thread but all we hear is that chairs are discussing the responses and will share further update, “interest” vs. “consensus” debate, the chairs are discussing how to initiate the PSD debate, etc. There were 65 emails on the original PSD poll. I am not sure why we need another round of debate and what will be the nature of that debate. Why not just start WG adoption call and gauge the WG “consensus”.


That’s exactly what we’re doing. The process for doing this begins with an IPR poll.

Nic started the IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex and draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-dex on Sept 3.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/XU3Ycij6Oq2kGWi14k3eXmpdQvM/
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7NmJqyMHDairPxEn7PGxz99KNiI/

Tony

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status