Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEFB1B3C93; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gWs7nZQ-9MyM; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028321B3C90; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CAG57721; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:38:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:38:09 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.229]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:37:59 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
Thread-Index: AQHRHWc1gTGSbOzvH02ylgQw7NT8Vp6YOBKAgAA7s4CAALjywA==
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:37:57 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28B626B7E@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <DM2PR05MB57378D0A32395685243A25EA5120@DM2PR05MB573.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <5644E1F7.5030404@gmail.com> <3A35CADE-3476-4EDB-BE90-8D1D2090E87C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A35CADE-3476-4EDB-BE90-8D1D2090E87C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28B626B7ESZXEMA510MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.56453F03.005D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.229, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: fbdec9cd1e3a40a72a55a1d02b1eb1ff
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Jwb6JRBwpg9D5AmSzwu2gd3YzGg>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:38:18 -0000

The same here.

Best regards,
Mach

From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpignata@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 6:35 AM
To: Stewart Bryant
Cc: Ross Callon; mpls@ietf.org; Stewart Bryant (stbryant); Mach Chen; Lizhenbin; Gregory Mirsky; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident

Ditto.

Thanks,

- Carlos.

On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com<mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote:

As a requirements draft, I know of no IPR per se,
but the reader may be drawn to the solutions
posited in the SFL drafts which do have disclosed IPR.

The reference in the text to the need to implement a
solution to

draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02>



by definition brings in it to play the IPR disclosed

against that draft.



- Stewart


On 12/11/2015 16:28, Ross Callon wrote:
Working Group,

The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident have told us that the
draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make it a working
group document.

Before we start the adoption poll we will do an IPR poll. This mail starts the IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are no IPR disclosures that relate to this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG co-chair)