Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDAD12090B; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BOUND_DIGITS_15=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrmSTi1Ee6bU; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF47B12081C; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id v24so21242947ljj.3; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SjlqpxcbFjrL5iuV71fHCUDINNRldJZ+Cnsr4uWAVDI=; b=XRvhxYhxy/YH9BWZc+KStRYv4qDaApS0zwTvjnWG2vP+Kmq8cUajyn5d/btssffRfc Bb1A41v/XZBb/tkzAsBoDQ/ynw6o4dgnN+RBYuVmo7W0KPP7FJM3UcE0FVk+oK3dn+qN l+XwWqOncRAUcJ8OtlG0qP3Fk3nHILTSVTQj80ZlvwjGNHqZ6isdsfNL6Y+Mo4JoA352 B4t4zhjUSI90eZmfRzLab2w5CrC7/P/jOnuBcyn73sS6ZrtpkARyy5y6QQES4g1oSwWN 0HL5r9iI1O64nx+Q7Qq+rTJAff1+tJPMR4j37/pfTkuQ998CQvl1kVRL9F/LYnVP3Vr1 oRGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SjlqpxcbFjrL5iuV71fHCUDINNRldJZ+Cnsr4uWAVDI=; b=m69GyaNjOeIGvP6KN4oBB7bXPV64FSU11zUTkWy0S2LUuh3h7HDyo9zZVHlNSHHBi4 4CdzzD1IvpczMaYSTfZ586KPacTYf0P8Ia9hdAlIPg83o0AbsIkLk/5MIPTKqSqpsWrX rwVJlPRHvvXjaSW4M9mo0DbcrqAyTRJgf5Dtm4XaoVh8GavVk4Yl0hxfn00tvx7Bct5D mAtRqwAtNIX9+1ryfSHANEAshxNFM/r13jb+77gaSqh0yaoNW19AsTGxBT2QXLag7Iv5 j6RQpmtaOLp0xtoPQt4FCYEunIyclULjXxYqH6hKl1nEDn7D+DsEWBE1je9JiF8sKarc lL0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8IDEm8ti7JD4NoECqQtFQu0A3Jq/sJirEwY/bx0DqOXfqynCV z0/JfYiAkOyKSxDbryQsuNdzkia420pKvAcI6m4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5B/4M5dFMXTPjjebsK+HsXDEUuUEYcVsgnhqxIh+jPBnmSiUPilA/rSqxB7CR+sXpb5elUPcJhteTJVth0n4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:89d3:: with SMTP id c19mr3681940ljk.201.1571838988012; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:56:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Greg Mirsky Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:56:17 -0400 Message-ID: To: Tarek Saad Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework@ietf.org" , MPLS Working Group Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008652580595944827" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR Poll: draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:56:32 -0000 --0000000000008652580595944827 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Tarek, et al., I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework. Regards, Greg On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:53 PM Tarek Saad wrote: > Hi Authors and MPLS WG, > > > > We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework for working group > last call. Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll. > > This email is to start the IPR poll. > > > > If you are aware of IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework > please respond to this email, and indicate whether it has been disclosed in > accordance to the IETF IPR rules (detailed are described in RFCs 3979, > 4879, 3669 and 5378). > > > > If you are an author or contributor please respond to this email > regardless of whether or not you're aware of any IPR. If you are not an > author or contributor, please explicitly respond only if you're aware > of IPR that has not yet been disclosed. > > > > This document will advance to WGLC only when all IPR confirmations from > all authors and contributors have been received. > > > > Regards, > > Tarek/Loa/Nic > > > --0000000000008652580595944827 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Tarek, et al.,
I'm not aware of any undisclosed= IPR related to draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework.

Reg= ards,
Greg

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:53 PM Tarek Saad <<= a href=3D"mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com">tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Authors and MPLS WG,

=C2=A0

We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-frame= work for working group last call. Part of this preparation is to do an IPR = poll.

This email is to start the IPR poll.

=C2=A0

If you are aware of=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0that applies to=C2= =A0draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework please respond to this email, and indicate= whether it has been disclosed in accordance to the IETF=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0rule= s (detailed are described in RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378).=

=C2=A0

If you are an=C2=A0author or contributor=C2=A0please= respond to this email regardless of whether or not you're aware of any= =C2=A0IPR. If you are not an author or contributor, please explicitly respo= nd only if you're aware of=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0that has not yet been disclosed.

=C2=A0

This document will advance to WGLC only when all IPR= =C2=A0confirmations from all authors and contributors have been received.

=C2=A0

Regards,

Tarek/Loa/Nic

=C2=A0

--0000000000008652580595944827--