Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)
"David Allan" <dallan@nortel.com> Tue, 19 August 2008 19:18 UTC
Return-Path: <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B3A28C16D; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F223A689F for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Po0l2ilSAE1P for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377FF3A69B7 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com [47.129.230.99]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id m7JJFxP24449; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:15:59 GMT
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:18:07 -0400
Message-ID: <87AC5F88F03E6249AEA68D40BD3E00BE16831AEB@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <48AB1B20.8020007@chello.nl>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)
Thread-Index: AckCL9DXQtXuCQFYQcmUqclohB/ALgAABRfg
References: <6535C9CED6F87446B41D20EF170F23620E36BF@mamxm01.ciena.com> <48AB1B20.8020007@chello.nl>
From: David Allan <dallan@nortel.com>
To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
No to CoS, yes to TMF.... Shakespeare was not an engineer... ;-) D -----Original Message----- From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Huub van Helvoort Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:13 PM Cc: mpls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of EXP field) Shakespear already wrote: " What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet " Cos or TMF (Traffic Management Field) or .... Cheers, Huub. ---------------------------------------------- > Ditto. > > No to CoS, Yes to TM... > > /himanshu > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf >> Of John Kenney >> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:32 PM >> To: Francois Le Faucheur IMAP >> Cc: mpls@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on renaming of >> EXP field) >> >> >> My "No" vote is a vote in favor of "Traffic Management" >> >> Francois Le Faucheur IMAP wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Someone earlier suggested "Traffic Management". While it can most >>> certainly be argued this would not be a perfect name either >> (or other >>> names would be closer to "perfection"), is there a good >> argument I am >>> missing for why "COS" is obviously better (or more "good >> enough") than >>> "Traffic Management"? (considering we want to capture both Diffserv >>> and ECN/PCN use of EXP field) >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Francois >>> >>> >>> On 18 Aug 2008, at 22:23, George Swallow wrote: >>> >>>> During the last call on "EXP field" renamed to "CoS Field" >>>> draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-04.txt, there were comments on >>>> alternatives to the name COS. >>>> >>>> This message initiates a two week poll on whether the name COS is >>>> good enough, or if some other name is needed. The poll closes >>>> 23:59 Sept 1 GMT. >>>> >>>> Please answer with a simple yes or no. You may send any >> additional >>>> comment >>>> in a separate message (with a different subject line). >>>> >>>> ...George >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mpls mailing list >>>> mpls@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpls mailing list >>> mpls@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> mpls@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >> > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > -- ================================================================ http://www.van-helvoort.eu/ ================================================================ Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else... _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Santiago Alvarez (saalvare)
- [mpls] discussion (was Re: Poll on renaming of EX… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [mpls] discussion (was Re: Poll on renaming o… George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Cao Wei
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field HENDERICKX Wim
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Harshith Shetty
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field jordan.britnell
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Jiang Yuan-long
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Matthew Meyer
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Tomohiro Otani
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Santanu.Ganguly
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field BOCCI Matthew
- Re: [mpls] discussion (was Re: Poll on renaming o… Shahram Davari
- [mpls] Question for clarification (was RE: Poll o… Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field phani bandaru
- Re: [mpls] Question for clarification (was RE: Po… Diego Caviglia
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field buyukkoc
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] Question for clarification (was RE: Po… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Shahram Davari
- [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on rena… Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Peter Tomsu
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field John Kenney
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … John Kenney
- [mpls] FW: Poll on renaming of EXP field Howard Green
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … David Allan
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Peng He
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Vijayanand C
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Tom Petch
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Daniele Ceccarelli
- [mpls] Discuss of EXP field Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Discuss of EXP field Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] "Traffic Management" (was Re: Poll on … Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Moshe Ashkenazi
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Vullo, Anthony D (Tony)
- Re: [mpls] FW: Poll on renaming of EXP field Vadali, Somayajulu (Somu)
- [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field mushaoxing 63008
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field saquib khan
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Annamaria Fulignoli
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Andrew Sergeev
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Michael Lyngbøl
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Ben Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Poll on renaming of EXP field Don Fedyk