[mpls] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 03 September 2015 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EED21B4586; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xxKNv9ELEZh; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89D51B4582; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150903065902.11053.69251.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:59:02 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/KpFCE8vuKkkmlPfGeINsmMGzRqc>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, jcucchiara@mindspring.com, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 06:59:04 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-09: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on the feedback of the security AD, the security guidelines for the
IETF MIB modules
(http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/mib-security) have been
changed 9 months ago.
The exact change at
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/mib-security?action=diff&version=7&old_version=6


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The MIB doctor latest review from Joan Cucchiara:

My comments (which I made to the authors also about Feb 28, 2015) was
about these warnings:
Warning with SMICNG compiler:

W: f(MPLS-TP-OAM-MIB.my), (883,22) MIN-ACCESS value identical to access
specified for "mplsOamIdMegOperStatus"
W: f(MPLS-TP-OAM-MIB.my), (888,22) MIN-ACCESS value identical to access
specified for "mplsOamIdMegSubOperStatus"

Yes, these are just warnings, but they are easily fixable and I believe
the authors agreed to fix these warnings during the AD review process
(that would be you 

Other than these warnings, the MIB is fine with me to go forward.