[mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8577 (5743)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 May 2019 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703CA1200E3; Thu, 30 May 2019 13:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJkaMFIVcB9F; Thu, 30 May 2019 13:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B5512008D; Thu, 30 May 2019 13:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 50EE0B80E43; Thu, 30 May 2019 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: vishnupavan@gmail.com, harish.ietf@gmail.com, vbeeram@juniper.net, tejal.parikh@verizon.com, tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20190530202048.50EE0B80E43@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Kt0KzwckxUvs_spbz1naoIUH51w>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8577 (5743)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 20:20:54 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC8577, "Signaling RSVP-TE Tunnels on a Shared MPLS Forwarding Plane". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5743

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>;
Date Reported: 2019-05-30
Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG)

Section: 11.3

Original Text
-------------
   IANA manages the "Record Route Object Sub-object Flags" registry as
   part of the "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
   TE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
   rsvp-te-parameters>.  Prior to this document, this registry did not
   include Label Sub-object Flags.  This document creates the addition
   of a new subregistry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.

      Flag  Name                    Reference

      0x1   Global Label            [RFC3209]
      0x02  TE Link Label           [RFC8577], Section 9.3
      0x04  Delegation Label        [RFC8577], Section 9.5


Corrected Text
--------------
   IANA manages the "Record Route Object Sub-object Flags" registry as
   part of the "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
   TE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
   rsvp-te-parameters>.  Prior to this document, this registry did not
   include Label Sub-object Flags.  This document creates the addition
   of a new subregistry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.

      Flag  Name                    Reference

      0x1   Global Label            [RFC3209]
      0x02  TE Link Label           [RFC8577], Section 9.3
      0x04  Delegation Label        [RFC8577], Section 9.5
 
  All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via
  Standards Action.

Notes
-----
This errata is being reported as a response to the following email from IANA.

**
Authors/WG Chairs/ADs for RFC 8577,

During the publication process, the registration procedures were unintentionally removed from the document.  Is this something that an errata should be submitted for?

In version 9 of the document, it says: All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via Standards Action.	

In the published RFC this sentence does not appear to be there.

Please advise.

Thank you,

Michelle Cotton
Protocol Parameters Engagement Sr. Manager

--------------------------------------
RFC8577 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Signaling RSVP-TE Tunnels on a Shared MPLS Forwarding Plane
Publication Date    : April 2019
Author(s)           : H. Sitaraman, V. Beeram, T. Parikh, T. Saad
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG