Re: [mpls] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures-01.txt

Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net> Mon, 23 August 2010 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <nitinb@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC553A6816 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHRAgwAocztY for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com (exprod7og121.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26903A6A75 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTHKTGXZdc6M4pwrf59mxfUU37QbhSTw5@postini.com; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:26:21 PDT
Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:25:42 -0700
From: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
To: "xiao.min2@zte.com.cn" <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:25:39 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures-01.txt
Thread-Index: ActChKj2vmCgKZ9ORv+X+aL/w3LDoQAUsf0X
Message-ID: <C897E103.17392%nitinb@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <OF3889503A.ACC4455E-ON48257788.001D969A-48257788.001E61AC@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:25:48 -0000

Hi Xioa,

> I have a question about the evolution of this draft.
> Do you plan to make this draft a RFC finally?

Yes.

> As I understand, the contents in this draft would better be merged into draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi
> and draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv seperately, which may make the document structure more clear.

I’ll leave that to the WG chairs.

Thanks
Nitin