[mpls] Continue discussion of draft-kompella-larp-00
"Lizhong Jin" <lizho.jin@gmail.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 14:19 UTC
Return-Path: <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A21A022B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:19:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dR0Tk1oZ0C5L for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22b.google.com (mail-pd0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84C51A0128 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 06:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r10so5200693pdi.30 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:19:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=g7fxRl16DBjQGXESct9vaPyrpQ+VU+Fc9a0P0nAtkKU=; b=XD3UX5DpZMPNjdIW+plHU/KrDxjXNiekS2AViNLiqAlLqqvTIbC+6aqKFZ00rCd2Mv a0rFz3aL5PSggghoj72esLDJF6LNMqk4sMIcikDmWhZHf9NSJuEKv5bWcZacIAO1kBBg eq6FKfNJHutP+aCPNTb/v3taR4Hvm0+K7HnA1TMUPXQH1A5rG+t8Xp8AGJAOOYZwXH3s plgS9byB1rvPYdMEy+2OQ3gA9hEKen5JgPTGGEkw6u4w7si9WqIgw2iF01UcwZh01YiU 7HFvFRF2zitthitPVCYgnfWTfwKazq7YEXuOR9jbUVqGdXJuvzIpHaCeytlunVQWH5dk vIcg==
X-Received: by 10.68.44.71 with SMTP id c7mr26391812pbm.24.1393942741865; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:19:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LizhongPC ([114.62.215.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vf7sm48333535pbc.5.2014.03.04.06.18.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:19:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
To: kireeti@juniper.net
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 22:18:51 +0800
Message-ID: <5315e0d4.e7ed440a.0724.1f6c@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01CF37F7.BEE54520"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac83tKpGrOjvtf9aQr2/uFi2RpIimQ==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/L5_ftDT-1nIj1Ro3efHn3XS1-JQ
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Continue discussion of draft-kompella-larp-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:19:08 -0000
Hi Kireeti, Thank you for the presentation. I have one question of the MPLS in DC. That is the middle box, e.g., firewall or DPI device. The packet with MPLS label, especially with two labels, could not be correctly parsed by the middle box. What’s your solution to the middle box where packet inspection is required. Move all the middle box function to host? Regards Lizhong
- [mpls] Continue discussion of draft-kompella-larp… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Continue discussion of draft-kompella-… Loa Andersson