[mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> Wed, 08 April 2015 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 892EC1ACD2F; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4AA1ACC86 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVFjX6rU_wAH for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279871ACC92 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org ([192.0.33.81]:42333 helo=smtp1.lax.icann.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <iana-shared@icann.org>) id 1YfzPR-0001t5-5U for draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:29:25 -0700
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t38NTIBO005942 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:29:19 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EE5C9C20812; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-815506@icann.org> <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-9412-1428535758-227.815506-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #815506
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:29:18 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.0.33.81
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iana-shared@icann.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150408232926.279871ACC92@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:29:26 -0700
Resent-From: iana-shared@icann.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools/GX8Ddr15fIYwC_qPU6v5bercvb0>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/LMLRmXc7BRUZ6ayksq6dmHXE8pI>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:29:29 -0000

Dear Authors:

ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED 

We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be:

draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05

NOTE: The following have been converted to lower case: "could" in TBA-9; "marked" in the notes attached to the registration procedures for the Downstream Mapping and Next Hop registries.

QUESTION: The existing sub-TLV registries list notes for each registration range. The new sub-TLV registry for Proxy Echo Parameters doesn't, because I couldn't find a source for those notes in RFC 4379. 

Should those notes ("This range is for mandatory TLVs or for optional TLVs that require an error message if not recognized," etc.) be included in this registry's registration procedures? If so, are these included or implied in RFC 4379? If there isn't a source for them in RFC 4379, they'll have to be spelled out in this document's IANA Considerations section. 

ACTION 1:

IANA has registered the following Message Types:

3	MPLS Proxy Ping Request	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
4	MPLS Proxy Ping Reply	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters


ACTION 2:

IANA has registered the following TLVs:

23	Proxy Echo Parameters	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]	[http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters.xml#sub-tlv-23]
24	Reply-to Address	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]	No Sub-TLVs
25	Upstream Neighbor Address	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]	No Sub-TLVs
26	Downstream Neighbor Address	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]	No Sub-TLVs

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters


ACTION 3:

IANA has registered the following Return Codes:

16	Proxy Ping not authorized.	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
17	Proxy Ping parameters need to be modified.	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
18	MPLS Echo Request could not be sent.	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
19	Replying router has FEC mapping for topmost FEC.	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters


ACTION 4:

IANA has created the following registry:

Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23
Reference
[RFC4379][RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]

Range 	Registration Procedures 
0-16383	Standards Action
16384-31743	Specification Required
32768-49161	Standards Action
49162-64511	Specification Required

Sub-Type 	Sub-TLV Name 	Reference 	Comment 
0	Reserved	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]	
1	Next Hop	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]	
2-64511	Unassigned		
64512-65535	Reserved for Vendor or Private Use	[RFC4379]

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters


ACTION 5:

IANA has made this document an additional reference for the Downstream Mapping Address Type Registry, added the note "Each time a code point is assigned from this registry, unless the  same registration is made in both registries, the corresponding Next  Hop Address Type Registry must be marked "Reserved" to the top of the registry, and added the following registrations:

6	Reserved		[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
7	Reserved		[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters


ACTION 6:

IANA has created the following registry:

Next Hop Address Type Registry
Registration Procedure(s): Standards Action
Reference: [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
Note: Each time a code point is assigned from this registry, unless the 
same registration is made in both registries, the corresponding 
Downstream Address Mapping Registry must be marked "Reserved."

Type 	Type of Next Hop 	Address Length 	IF Length 	Reference 
0	Unassigned			
1	IPv4 Numbered	4	4	[RFC4379]
2	IPv4 Unnumbered	4	4	[RFC4379]
3	IPv6 Numbered	16	16	[RFC4379]
4	IPv6 Unnumbered	16	4	[RFC4379]
5	Reserved			[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
6	IPv4 Protocol Adj	4	0	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
7	IPv6 Protocol Adj	16	0	[RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05]
8-255	Unassigned

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters


The updated list of Protocol Registries is available here:
 
http://www.iana.org/protocols

Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon as we receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that this document's IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a team of authors, one reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.)

We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that they've assigned a number.

Thanks,

Amanda Baber
IANA Request Specialist
ICANN