[mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> Wed, 08 April 2015 23:29 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 892EC1ACD2F; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4AA1ACC86 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVFjX6rU_wAH for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279871ACC92 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org ([192.0.33.81]:42333 helo=smtp1.lax.icann.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <iana-shared@icann.org>) id 1YfzPR-0001t5-5U for draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:29:25 -0700
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t38NTIBO005942 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:29:19 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EE5C9C20812; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-815506@icann.org> <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-9412-1428535758-227.815506-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #815506
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:29:18 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.0.33.81
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iana-shared@icann.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150408232926.279871ACC92@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:29:26 -0700
Resent-From: iana-shared@icann.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools/GX8Ddr15fIYwC_qPU6v5bercvb0>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/LMLRmXc7BRUZ6ayksq6dmHXE8pI>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:29:29 -0000
Dear Authors: ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05 NOTE: The following have been converted to lower case: "could" in TBA-9; "marked" in the notes attached to the registration procedures for the Downstream Mapping and Next Hop registries. QUESTION: The existing sub-TLV registries list notes for each registration range. The new sub-TLV registry for Proxy Echo Parameters doesn't, because I couldn't find a source for those notes in RFC 4379. Should those notes ("This range is for mandatory TLVs or for optional TLVs that require an error message if not recognized," etc.) be included in this registry's registration procedures? If so, are these included or implied in RFC 4379? If there isn't a source for them in RFC 4379, they'll have to be spelled out in this document's IANA Considerations section. ACTION 1: IANA has registered the following Message Types: 3 MPLS Proxy Ping Request [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 4 MPLS Proxy Ping Reply [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] Please see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters ACTION 2: IANA has registered the following TLVs: 23 Proxy Echo Parameters [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] [http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters.xml#sub-tlv-23] 24 Reply-to Address [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] No Sub-TLVs 25 Upstream Neighbor Address [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] No Sub-TLVs 26 Downstream Neighbor Address [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] No Sub-TLVs Please see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters ACTION 3: IANA has registered the following Return Codes: 16 Proxy Ping not authorized. [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 17 Proxy Ping parameters need to be modified. [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 18 MPLS Echo Request could not be sent. [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 19 Replying router has FEC mapping for topmost FEC. [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] Please see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters ACTION 4: IANA has created the following registry: Sub-TLVs for TLV Type 23 Reference [RFC4379][RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] Range Registration Procedures 0-16383 Standards Action 16384-31743 Specification Required 32768-49161 Standards Action 49162-64511 Specification Required Sub-Type Sub-TLV Name Reference Comment 0 Reserved [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 1 Next Hop [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 2-64511 Unassigned 64512-65535 Reserved for Vendor or Private Use [RFC4379] Please see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters ACTION 5: IANA has made this document an additional reference for the Downstream Mapping Address Type Registry, added the note "Each time a code point is assigned from this registry, unless the same registration is made in both registries, the corresponding Next Hop Address Type Registry must be marked "Reserved" to the top of the registry, and added the following registrations: 6 Reserved [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 7 Reserved [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] Please see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters ACTION 6: IANA has created the following registry: Next Hop Address Type Registry Registration Procedure(s): Standards Action Reference: [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] Note: Each time a code point is assigned from this registry, unless the same registration is made in both registries, the corresponding Downstream Address Mapping Registry must be marked "Reserved." Type Type of Next Hop Address Length IF Length Reference 0 Unassigned 1 IPv4 Numbered 4 4 [RFC4379] 2 IPv4 Unnumbered 4 4 [RFC4379] 3 IPv6 Numbered 16 16 [RFC4379] 4 IPv6 Unnumbered 16 4 [RFC4379] 5 Reserved [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 6 IPv4 Protocol Adj 4 0 [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 7 IPv6 Protocol Adj 16 0 [RFC-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05] 8-255 Unassigned Please see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters The updated list of Protocol Registries is available here: http://www.iana.org/protocols Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon as we receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that this document's IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a team of authors, one reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.) We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that they've assigned a number. Thanks, Amanda Baber IANA Request Specialist ICANN
- [mpls] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request'… The IESG
- [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPL… Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… George Swallow (swallow)
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… George Swallow (swallow)
- [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPL… Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… George Swallow (swallow)
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy… George Swallow (swallow)
- [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPL… Amanda Baber via RT