Re: [mpls] [spring] working group last call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing

Rob Shakir <> Thu, 23 July 2015 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F7C1A8A77; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bhBnFr69yxQ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a03:9800:10:4c::cafe:b00c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0181A8A55; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (helo=corretto.local) by with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <>) id 1ZIBO7-000255-Qs; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:57:55 +0100
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:58:02 +0100
From: Rob Shakir <>
To: "John G. Scudder" <>,
Message-ID: <etPan.55b09e8a.4d2d94c4.17e@corretto.local>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Airmail (303)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="55b09e8a_22de06fe_17e"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] working group last call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:58:15 -0000

Hi Bruno, John,

Whilst I’m an author — I’ll still comment here. It would be good to see the SPRING WG finalise this document. Rapid progress is being made to multi-vendor implementations within live networks of the SPRING technology. It would be good to start getting documents such as this one - which underpins many of the other standards for SR published.

On 22 July 2015 at 14:13:06, John G. Scudder ( wrote:
Authors, please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if so, whether it has been disclosed. (Please do this even if you've done it before, thanks for your help.) 
I’m not aware of IPR other than that which has already been disclosed on this document.