Re: [mpls] Question on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis-09.txt

Hi, Mustapha,

On Nov 28, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) <mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com<mailto:mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,
You meant: {Section 5.1, Section 5.2, Section 5.*3*} .

Yes, sorry for the typo.

Also, you need to reference draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis-09.txt instead of RFC 4379 throughout the document and replace DSMAP TLV with DDMAP TLV (RFC 6424).

Indeed. We were waiting for 4379bis to be approved, now is the right time.

We are planning on making all these changes and submit a new rev.

I have a few more comments on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-01 which I will be sending in a separate message.

Look forward.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

Regards,
Mustapha.

From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpignata@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 8:54 AM
To: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) <mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com<mailto:mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com>>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Question on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis-09.txt

Thank you Mustapha for catching these, and Tom and Mach for the follow-ups.

There are three changes needed to draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping based based on this discussion:

  1.  In Section 10.1, update the references to {Section 4.1, Section 4.2, Section 4.1} -> {Section 5.1, Section 5.2, Section 5.1}
  2.  Create a Section 10.2, create a registry for the “Protocol field of the Label Stack Sub-TLV of the Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV”, registering values 0-4, and asking for TBD5 and TBD6. If this happens in this draft instead of 4379bis, I believe it is OK.
  3.  Create a Section 10.3, requesting error code TBD.

Thanks!

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."

On Nov 24, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) <mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com<mailto:mustapha.aissaoui@nokia.com>> wrote:

Dear all,
Can someone point me to where are held the IANA allocation for the values in the ‘protocol’ field of the Label Stack Sub-TLV of the Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV?

There is draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-01 which is adding IS-IS and OSPF as new values into this field but I fail to find where these are maintained.

Regards,
Mustapha.
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls