[mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis as a wg doc

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Working Group,

This is to start a three week (because of the holiday season) poll
to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
group mailing list ([e-mail]) Please give a technical
motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There are no IPR disclosures directly against 
draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis document. However, there are IPR disclosures 
against
RFC 4379.

We have started an IPR poll in parallel to the adoption poll.

The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.

We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content
and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the
MPLS wg list or any IETF mailing lists.

However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the
working group should continue progress the document, regardless of
an existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your
'support/do not support' when responding to working group adoption
calls and last calls.

This working group adoptiom poll ends January 8, 2016.

/Loa
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]