IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Heads Up - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6428 (3629) and RFC6428 (4415)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 19 July 2015 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB3A1AC3D4 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eT4iNtgpu0hb for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84871A9147 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.253] (unknown [62.168.35.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C1EC18013BE; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:34:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55AB6F10.30900@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:34:08 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
References: <20130521141350.EF4F862100@rfc-editor.org> <55A60407.9060108@pi.nu> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C4AF13A1D@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <55A78CE8.9090100@cisco.com> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C4AF1417E@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <55A7E40B.1050101@pi.nu> <9DE89329-96C5-4381-8F39-B00031D992E1@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <9DE89329-96C5-4381-8F39-B00031D992E1@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/LYqaQcZQGwfvDvpoxr4Fx_fzcJM>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "rcallon@juniper.net" <rcallon@juniper.net>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "alan.davey@metaswitch.com" <alan.davey@metaswitch.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Heads Up - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6428 (3629) and RFC6428 (4415)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:34:20 -0000

Alice,

Yes that is the right procedure for RFC6428 (3629).

I will lean a bit on Dave and Stewart to see if we need to reopen
it. Let us close loops during the IETF week.

In the mean time errata for RFC6428 (4415) my take is that it is correct
and can be verified.

/Loa



On 2015-07-17 21:49, Alice Russo wrote:
> Loa wrote:
>> We also have an old erratum RFC6428 (3629), this was verified back in
>> 2013. If we want to reopen this we will need a new errata.
>
> Actually, rather than report a new one, we suggest correcting the existing erratum. To do this, simply send a request to the RFC Editor that the existing one be reopened. Then, it can be edited as needed by the verifying party (in this case, an AD).
>
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ar
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email