[mpls] Question relating to the mpls restoration modes and the mpls vpn ones

Najat Nassit <nnassit@gmail.com> Fri, 24 December 2010 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <nnassit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DB13A66B4 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZzr7OrW1Apk for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C821F3A657C for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so3163314gyd.31 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:33:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NMQAQ+YJ4XUMsGVSI6wnnuRqebR4HtuoJFQlbWRE7mI=; b=TRTX4DwzkjkgAxQhDDuJ+mOX/IYnbVwwsZZ81vRDucMvnSuo23UOflPS4Ks70e/2u8 KmIUftqvaJN4JfuCwNtthItCFw/h1t9xRXomLJe6JQmxxpa+CRuZ0BfbAQsS2GELlTLp P9VdEDH7H2esfPeYG/meaUp7IQ/Qnvovwh86w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aiqsNGA4gJnj6C3M+p5Ty8mg/zst/mKAc+o9Ec6or+8sZAj/mWGhW0dhWdZHRmMw8d 06tu6hjNMjrZTFDugYwCeZDn+ohFZhDiT2bWzNksHpx9MfxnV431ZY085iJCLJ+xfz1c K16eNNOm/PT+dxopA7eoeVHm0rsc2FjG3WMNE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.63.1 with SMTP id l1mr664657aga.87.1293190412997; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:33:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.134.19 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:33:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:33:32 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTin_c-2fhYKf5PGZ6jmLb-ZiVcTf3r82480u47zm@mail.gmail.com>
From: Najat Nassit <nnassit@gmail.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e64f483a31936a0498265bab"
Subject: [mpls] Question relating to the mpls restoration modes and the mpls vpn ones
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:31:31 -0000

Hi every body,

I can't see clear the difference between the two restoration modes : in the
mpls vpn network and in the simple mpls network.

Any clarification please?

Najat.