Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 30 August 2019 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C74120108; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ggXFjPu9; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kxxAKG27
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdSW2r0sF44T; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A261E12001B; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9299; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567201221; x=1568410821; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Fd4PBwNrl9BoLQU/TimxTeiP1K0jaGuPDgH8tyRGDYY=; b=ggXFjPu9FjVGoKA7XqAU+2UYZLaxlkVDczG2w+4IDcadHeXrB02S3Zzw W29enWMVz+TKnFo4QGieBHflFKo5PEPfx4gvNvvqE9wkzso58Ow41HXIz bin7SRbsiY9TNJCND54CGhLhlzRhlmXt7QK00jmw4keF4RdlbwTvOPnNR E=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AWaIVCxBOEJ01raR0vr6IUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qgw3kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMdRXUg?= =?us-ascii?q?Mdz8AfngguGsmAXETwIfPCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BUAADDlmld/5hdJa1mHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBUwcBAQsBgRUvUANtViAECyqEIYNHA4RShiKCNyWTEIRcgS6BJANUCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQwBAS0CAQGEPxmCSSM0CQ4CAwgBAQQBAQECAQYEbYUuAQuFSgECAQMSCwY?= =?us-ascii?q?KEwEBNwERAQYCEQMBAiQHAgQwHQoEDgUigwABgR1NAx0BApJNkGECgTiIYXO?= =?us-ascii?q?BMoJ8AQEFhRcYghYJgTQBi3cYgX+BOAwTgh4uPoRkgmsygiaPKIUcl08Kgh+?= =?us-ascii?q?UVxuCMoc2jnqNcphEAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBU7KgGCQYJCOIM6ilNygSm?= =?us-ascii?q?ODwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,447,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="322605288"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Aug 2019 21:40:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7ULeKJi011763 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:40:20 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:40:19 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:40:18 -0400
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:40:18 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GHZ1xV6bTZV0KnM0RZrQnnFzs/KGVPONuw2Yl0sxXh52VZCs7nG++1Esz7mCfgo64YBhgWt+pei1Nkhk0W9dErgh/p/XG/cJOgm+cNM73Sa4XxdPSMn0wEJUKucDgm1OEGwBOCgeE5Vj6qGY4u82vavkdtqmgs+cqHpe/P1rrt09iCzS5VJIBMgfa5ymac1SslGJS9VDWQVEcIR7cI9nz8KBhGzc+Lkdloaw1bCVjsqWPNcCSt1Wq/HAxsJ+u8dRDSzI6tVygIdNJxM3IVMgIecYYJujOAJYvgFMoxUVREJK0qiJcaWayALWA65F2x0KNrZucp40hzsSRNF8FM0LzQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fd4PBwNrl9BoLQU/TimxTeiP1K0jaGuPDgH8tyRGDYY=; b=f8Q3ARZVKcg1Agvg/S1yQ6AutCds3cNp1bHT+bnDI78OTlRenTYxYAyq1pBFw81/FgHcJyvBSAyeJBaFb33mi6fO5LgUyyiVQgWlQ4oBKwrUl5MB5BVcnEgVPOkLPb97cwL9RqXasi6MkPnYz0OEbrPRy6lx6U56/BE5ARZE/2nbF4wl+7QyNhaZx2GOOHp6Xn/ihlwnHIskelmvP4UfHMxtvnQD/Iq80KeTXAKTMjD2wbFtVhvgl07WVYr/5wO/ZgSJnFVH8hX4MhpS/tM/OAWARs/TCon8sHNhUqL7v8GSZlSoWTMczDDj9SAP4fuoKS1jis5Zw8l+f16dGA+cUw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fd4PBwNrl9BoLQU/TimxTeiP1K0jaGuPDgH8tyRGDYY=; b=kxxAKG27QP1v3yY3U025uQdAQeLTogLkjnKaid3IeGGzQF3mPED1fP0DiB/oAtAVmTd/D/V/qcP8bxhSH73WmPWgCw9r2Bny9lVLomPDpay76Jq/xIBvXGuZSEEEjK0i15IEVpJr2W5CWVsauz45bLGFsdXCMY9VRNCsB0r7+Bw=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4446.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.36.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2199.20; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:40:17 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2199.021; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:40:17 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Thread-Index: AQHVX3uDUWyQb0UWL0aGMOcDnMmpNw==
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:40:17 +0000
Message-ID: <07ACE34D-7238-4EBE-AFA7-2DE0383B36C6@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::96]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f93c892a-b1d6-4f92-80ca-08d72d92a67a
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4446;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4446:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB44464A3A8144DEBCBD798DC0C2BD0@MN2PR11MB4446.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 0145758B1D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(476003)(54896002)(478600001)(6306002)(6436002)(76116006)(6116002)(6916009)(5640700003)(46003)(6246003)(4326008)(71190400001)(5660300002)(25786009)(66946007)(33656002)(53936002)(486006)(2351001)(7736002)(36756003)(54906003)(450100002)(86362001)(53546011)(66476007)(66446008)(99286004)(2906002)(186003)(102836004)(6512007)(71200400001)(64756008)(6506007)(66556008)(6486002)(8676002)(81156014)(81166006)(229853002)(14454004)(1730700003)(316002)(2501003)(8936002)(790700001)(256004)(2616005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4446; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: jqeuM5MW9wZRGCZQd4s2W8Nkdtmgmfuzvw9sKs7+CJPWDP+J/xwVzapEkYktAJZs7dA1IPeYV/k4tGcnuYajQRNrNJ+jFRS4psgORmdEbGm9agkAEouAZp0Xy4p8w3e0bmv8YKFUmuMryMmitnrG3Y78sjadfx9NpXqeAicNtETlUb5RUm9S/lEsNETtyiBvSt6EXwYeZqcMq8sppkoGok4mUrmEiVbaELa/hDeCanVg1SfKhx/cYVuc6WbzDlrzDPgHe/OjRcUqtrOIE6C9td/JkaBdcUjA+nixAU5CN3vx9CI23Qui5ab0Ce3LALUQkmnTsCrnYy4KZff6V5Ht99thQNn70GQCmqq/eKgP71h4cGMRbi4dqWivZ7oFCLttPD0cAipcGMgdAzUgncMeVO6a69Ap5UkS8fyVrLsZWeA=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_07ACE34D72384EBEAFA72DE0383B36C6ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f93c892a-b1d6-4f92-80ca-08d72d92a67a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Aug 2019 21:40:17.6196 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +LwMrl5LjvbOGGgw7bYhgR6o/F5lC2H3Qn4DINwaLyuT4aq5YMHEypGnXdTUi6GI
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4446
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/LtvlYEL5oHzEEzDCkUV-3e2H3Sc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:40:25 -0000

Speaking a WG member:

I support publication. I have the same comments as the OSPF ELC draft.


  1.  There are a couple instances of “Signalling” here too.
  2.  Why does this referred to stacked LSPs? I think it could be applicable to a single LSP.
  3.  In the “Security Considerations”, please say the considerations of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 are also applicable.

Thanks,
Acee

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>; on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;
Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:45 PM
To: "lsr@ietf.org"; <lsr@ietf.org>;
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org"; <mpls@ietf.org>;, "lsr-ads@ietf.org"; <lsr-ads@ietf.org>;, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org"; <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>;
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue.
This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014. Also, review comments are certainly welcome.
Thanks,
Acee