[mpls] Discussion of tuning Routing Area working groups
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 22 August 2014 11:58 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2F21A0267 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7fJS6DJntLoV for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E8F1A00EB for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s7MBfcOI025501 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:41:38 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s7MBfWkY025458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:41:33 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:58:01 +0100
Message-ID: <010e01cfbe00$54d2eae0$fe78c0a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac++AFGdRxYEp4A6Sa6WeCetrPJBpA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-20898.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.626-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--11.626-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: dVYa3yVSesToyJCZV0+mCEhEDfw/93BuH181YDtIVarM7zpEspqG/6TY tf9nwiNjbF7poigH+cNw2WXu5+qnAuc4dc7zuu2RT7jCYv2QJPH2kudi1D33ErJ3rmpkUU+TQSG U3Un9hF6Mc6UdzVWBosRab/kqwX/XGAdnzrnkM485f9Xw/xqKXdivpTdmVCR22bNx1HEv7HAqtq 5d3cxkNXOGGVViHtAm7t4H4EOuMXkFYbuHOZKZI/eZBdDLdCZ6duHE81uZSnY=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/M0XxYebyqkSkM3VA_prdax1m84w
Subject: [mpls] Discussion of tuning Routing Area working groups
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:58:12 -0000
Hi, Just wanted to bring to your attention that there is a discussion on the Routing Discussion mailing list about possible ways to restructure a few of the working groups in the Routing Area. This concerns MPLS as the discussion relates to where to put work concerning TE Architecture and RSVP-TE. You can subscribe to the list and see the message archive at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion Please join in if you have an opinion. Thanks, Adrian
- [mpls] Discussion of tuning Routing Area working … Adrian Farrel