[mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]

"Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com> Fri, 28 February 2020 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <skraza@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391A23A0F2C; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:42:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Y7n77TPZ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=tOzFRfGK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cn9gruK8ODeV; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EBA73A0F2A; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:42:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3568; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582864932; x=1584074532; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zKRQGZt06Rw+XmzmnhDJM46YEh2IqYVwVrsZXr61icQ=; b=Y7n77TPZ9v7hUGXkcwF9KFMnDNTqJpCtGO7Ew4BT2JC7DhMxDhOpDlDR l32HxMaqg6QO91MD5id+5WEWwhgEkqwim+CfH5YvqrsYoJvAVQRzTQS+c D7OvcLgFcRx254TjzLFYzHVGiha6xsKTjZRHqmRFu06UcVaQFQUz1uYRS Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A4dKN7BaRegMK1oP2qpzGlhz/LSx94ef9IxIV55?= =?us-ascii?q?w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20Q6bRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn?= =?us-ascii?q?1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavxbDYzDs1qX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C4BQCpmVhe/4gNJK1mHAEBAQEBBwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BEQEEBAEBgXuBVFAFbFggBAsqCoQKg0YDimaCOpg5gUKBEANUCQEBAQwBASM?= =?us-ascii?q?KAgQBAYRAGYFxJDgTAgMNAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFZQEDExERDAEBNwERASI?= =?us-ascii?q?CHwcCBDAVEgQBDQUigwQBgkoDDiABDqNRAoE5iGJ1gTKCfwEBBYEvAYNRGII?= =?us-ascii?q?MAwaBDiqMJRqCAIERJwwUgwqCZAEFgSwBEgE4gnoygiyNTBISgjo7nkVwCoI?= =?us-ascii?q?8BJIvhDIcgkmIG5BKjnCBTZZmgxQCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiZ1gRCHAVZQGCDQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BMlAYDY4dOIM7hRSFQXSBKYx7AYEPAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,493,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="446631384"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 28 Feb 2020 04:42:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01S4gBFU001449 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:42:11 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:42:11 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:42:10 -0600
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:42:10 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FywNAPXOKbxX1cowjD1NS7kzl1VBGtIpI9TTwtJFHPvPI8wlG29dKaovxshUCnEqgAifJg5GeomOz3s3qcReYj7Fey7KQoARM7+7TScPCtuMxBwEvNYXfeso8kXW+H2P2RG+NbinRPAgrL+8oP3Gl7CLxl1Ue0WtDGpSLQk4gQh4pA0orSo837fW7pKIpekCFUnVsUwUNqkSnfycvG3vfar+sVyMij5zf1dZx/2ceHKaOXeHPV8WTHEFbmDaLhm7d1gDe1Qaf+6W5fq8tPkVvL3FNnp2IX0laCmt3bq0zvW98IVm3hff3YgJPTlQvbgbDQk0jjIUzA4BLqK+F0fR9w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zKRQGZt06Rw+XmzmnhDJM46YEh2IqYVwVrsZXr61icQ=; b=h5sGHAUhYZJSVxlkKJH6dyTJNa4IQqQZpgC3KVnYkIMRzBaTucPKVtPtmfVAx05dNDy0Lr6GqNlnEE+5hm4O5LGJEJAPoZk7Eb8YevZon/xyWePcFRQS7jJDTWdd0x0XcAEacJL1zn8Tpx+Bf1yyJIQRmfnBRzq68PVYVEhqBexdTb2/Lv8HLPDFY7FyX7EW66475+FxFASKlQmRNQQW9EczwR3q4chc2rX2dD1yuOpZN4kfYXK5exbRHozCfBv1OOPeUFB9JEVJK086XpxTrk+cBjV/GqKdMsd05XEJupFDV++ontxcolan9m2hIp1nG7+oAR88TTf7mJAqrUSJGA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zKRQGZt06Rw+XmzmnhDJM46YEh2IqYVwVrsZXr61icQ=; b=tOzFRfGKAQxe1ErWo+0+mwVuuzT92GHuAYv3pyojB9pUBw1r8kcw4WAMz65nU4m7CR7AQLdii/Rcsu1KJL0ToPd2NregpageARAk01q6wKVk16W34Ylgzsq4uRTtTIIOF46Y/+4qxPEzTyI9NEuYv0Qo4s0bv0pUINpmidOqoRo=
Received: from BL0PR11MB3412.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:7c::32) by BL0PR11MB3347.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2f::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.14; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:42:10 +0000
Received: from BL0PR11MB3412.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29ec:dcc7:ed48:3f7e]) by BL0PR11MB3412.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29ec:dcc7:ed48:3f7e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.021; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:42:09 +0000
From: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]
Thread-Index: AQHV7fFv5sl8gq0py0KrVY3HQwmwgA==
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:42:09 +0000
Message-ID: <DFD2C966-4912-45CF-B7BA-0AC78AD01BE8@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=skraza@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a6e6f6f1-678b-4f9f-5611-08d7bc089279
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR11MB3347:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL0PR11MB3347ED1ACD5D5CAA5D8DCD5DD0E80@BL0PR11MB3347.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0327618309
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(346002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(316002)(110136005)(26005)(4326008)(36756003)(54906003)(2616005)(15650500001)(2906002)(478600001)(186003)(81156014)(81166006)(6486002)(8676002)(33656002)(5660300002)(966005)(86362001)(6512007)(6506007)(66476007)(71200400001)(8936002)(66946007)(64756008)(66446008)(66556008)(76116006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BL0PR11MB3347; H:BL0PR11MB3412.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: /CVN22uH/q5sb+QC01hWeWJgfovk3MNnCyAzS/IzNTitrXkGGJwBj9YP/l/jW7/eQN19Vz3GiUUOLxU5BGTLKQtqfjuxcNYLw4iCQBGobMmWsWn7i9f4dhqP4XzyyIOYGjoDqfsgRAqv5/NKeg9izA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FF6EC289034AB24196702B0DD8B96720@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a6e6f6f1-678b-4f9f-5611-08d7bc089279
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Feb 2020 04:42:09.7801 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 6GRZ4H2CBaC+Ii2z1U8Qi0Ngo4qUI1y2EuIIFVqJmgvVWdog0gexF0UbB+Ls6WO1CS0d0Gv/yBVNRlAqg17wjg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR11MB3347
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/M3LoE7HRtaZvhr5e_DQ8YQTURc0>
Subject: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:42:14 -0000

Thanks for your review and comments.
We have posted a new rev -08 that takes care of your comments and comments from other IESG reviewers.
On behalf of authors, Please see further inline [skraza]:


On 2019-12-04, 8:20 PM, "Adam Roach via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanks to all contributors and working group members who worked on this
    document.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    The front page contains six authors' names, while the "Authors' Addresses"
    section at the end of the document contains 10. To avoid complications in
    AUTH48, please clearly move all but six (or, preferably, five -- see RFC 7322
    section 4.1.1) such names to the "Contributors" section.

[skraza]: Done.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I share Ben's concerns regarding the way these models treat IPv4 as
    "basic" functionality, and IPv6 as "extended" functionality.
    See https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/ for the current
    IAB guidance on IPv6 in IETF protocols.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[skraza]: Please see our response to Ben's email.

    
    >       FEC-Label bindings:
    >           FEC 203.0.113.1/32:
    >             advertised: local-label 16000
    >               peer 192.0.2.1:0
    >               peer 192.0.2.2:0
    >               peer 192.0.2.3:0
    >             received:
    >               peer 192.0.2.1:0, label 16002, used-in-forwarding=Yes
    >               peer 192.0.2.2:0, label 17002, used-in-forwarding=No
    >           FEC 203.0.113.2/32:
    >              . . . .
    >           FEC 198.51.100.0/24:
    >              . . . .
    >
    >       Address bindings:
    >           Addr 192.0.2.10:
    >             advertised
    >           Addr 192.0.2.1:
    >             received, peer 192.0.2.1:0
    >           Addr 192.0.2.2:
    >             received, peer 192.0.2.2:0
    >           Addr 192.0.2.3:
    >             received, peer 192.0.2.3:0
    >
    >                                Figure 12
    
    Please update this example to use IPv6, or add an example that shows IPv6.
    Refer again to the IAB statement cited above for details.


[skraza]: Done.