Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6428 (3629)

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Folks,

The errata seems correct, but I'd like the authors to nod also :),
John, George and/or Dave.

/Loa

On 2013-05-21 16:13, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6428,
> "Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the MPLS Transport Profile".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6428&eid=3629
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Alan Davey <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 3.5.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> The length is the length of the following data: the Global_ID, Node Identifier, and Attachment Circuit ID (AC_ID) are as per [9].
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The length is the length of the data following the length field.  The Global_ID, Node Identifier, and Attachment Circuit ID (AC_ID) are as per [9].
>
>
> Notes
> -----
>
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6428 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the MPLS Transport Profile
> Publication Date    : November 2011
> Author(s)           : D. Allan, Ed., G. Swallow Ed., J. Drake Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>