[mpls] R: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident

Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it> Fri, 13 November 2015 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1CC1B2A5B; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:50:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1mGflgbj-B2W; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:50:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from teledg001ba020.telecomitalia.it (teledg001ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08031B29D4; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_37f4a957-bd37-4bf6-8818-bee1178b8dc1_"
Received: from TELCAH001BA020.telecomitalia.local (10.188.101.214) by teledg001ba020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.101.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:50:40 +0100
Received: from TELMBB001BA020.telecomitalia.local ([169.254.2.123]) by TELCAH001BA020.telecomitalia.local ([10.188.101.214]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:50:40 +0100
From: Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "Mach Chen (mach.chen@huawei.com)" <mach.chen@huawei.com>, "lizhenbin@huawei.com" <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
Thread-Index: AQHRHWc1gTGSbOzvH02ylgQw7NT8Vp6YrWuAgAF7PFA=
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:50:39 +0000
Message-ID: <23126F6FC5CA3E44916CF99D4E0B878B44E87AAA@TELMBB001BA020.telecomitalia.local>
References: <DM2PR05MB57378D0A32395685243A25EA5120@DM2PR05MB573.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <5644E1F7.5030404@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5644E1F7.5030404@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: it-IT
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.188.101.188]
x-ti-disclaimer: Disclaimer1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/MQWQkbA0sC9ylCzXJPgriV0uJqM>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] R: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:50:47 -0000

I'm agree with Stewart.
This draft introduces the requirements for MPLS flow identification, so there are not IPRs per se.
But the SFL drafts have a declared IPR, because these drafts describe how to use draft-tempia-ippm-p3m for RFC6374 performance measurements.

Giuseppe


Da: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Stewart Bryant
Inviato: giovedì 12 novembre 2015 20:01
A: Ross Callon; mpls@ietf.org; Stewart Bryant (stbryant); Carlos Pignataro (cpignata); Mach Chen (mach.chen@huawei.com); lizhenbin@huawei.com; Gregory Mirsky
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Oggetto: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident

As a requirements draft, I know of no IPR per se,
but the reader may be drawn to the solutions
posited in the SFL drafts which do have disclosed IPR.

The reference in the text to the need to implement a
solution to

draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02>



by definition brings in it to play the IPR disclosed

against that draft.



- Stewart


On 12/11/2015 16:28, Ross Callon wrote:
Working Group,

The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident have told us that the
draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make it a working
group document.

Before we start the adoption poll we will do an IPR poll. This mail starts the IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are no IPR disclosures that relate to this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG co-chair)


Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.

[rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.