[mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC3031 (5002)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 13 June 2017 05:28 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78D6129B41; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqJgEgZ1iXt5; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53100129B40; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C0200B80D27; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
To: eric.gray@ericsson.com, erosen@cisco.com, arun@force10networks.com, rcallon@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170613052823.C0200B80D27@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:28:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Mp7WI_doCNIyIAozcdR3DeTpvS8>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC3031 (5002)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:28:36 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC3031, "Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5002 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Date Reported: 2017-04-21 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 3.8 Original Text ------------- Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing changes, but conservative label retention mode though requires an LSR to maintain many fewer labels. Corrected Text -------------- Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing changes, while conservative label retention mode requires an LSR to maintain many fewer labels. Notes ----- Grammar error in original text, which may make it harder for some to read and understand. Verifier Notes: (removed the spurious "though") -------------------------------------- RFC3031 (draft-ietf-mpls-arch-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture Publication Date : January 2001 Author(s) : E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF
- [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC3031 (5002) RFC Errata System