[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr

[Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tarek,

 

I understand your enthusiasm to complete this work.

 

But I am a little surprised at this last call.

 

I did a review of -04 on April 21st.

-05 was posted on May 1st but it was only a keep-alive, and no changes were
made to the text.

There has been some traffic on the list with reviews from others and Jags
agreeing to make some changes. But other issues remain open and unresolved.

 

If we are last calling -05, then my answer has to be, "No, not ready."

If we are last calling -05 and the set of promised changes, then surely it
would be easier to review if -06 was posted with those changes. But even
then, my answer is, "No, not ready," because of the open unresolved issues.

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: Tarek Saad <[e-mail]> 
Sent: 04 June 2024 03:50
To: [e-mail]
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr

 

Dear WG,

 

This email starts a two-week Working Group last call for
draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr/> .

 

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed
to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If
you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and
it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and
nits are most welcome.

 

Please send your comments to the mpls WG mailing list ([e-mail])

If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.

 

Note, currently there are 5 IPR disclosures against this document at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-mn
a-hdr> &id=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr

 

This poll runs until June 18, 2024.

 

Thank you,

Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)