IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Fri, 16 October 2020 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D443A0A24; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5fXyxkmawWx; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552283A0A26; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id y12so3841068wrp.6; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gjEcuja2ZR2PhI0P3BFYdxjfmKN4SkrB5hLFJZdOOVs=; b=Ni9iL2E6Z32/bD8ObGs2Ad4US9CL5TaOGo3cKtacgHmSQl5MItGKPX5EZirOy8hNn2 MFWSDQQjjRXNibOFL7kkRXQb3nVvXAUj5auYGWfwL5FKdass7FDgXnSecSZsnwQn2yDB PDt0OqI5eVER+D8K1xoXz3P1UvobfoRLbirCoFKxfnPs5kHRRlzPJ0q5akUxGl+gS3Mh HEXhtrKSe85cLtQDy2kPBVw9Izan73vKF4W2aHDmwKaDAnPsuRsdGQKM/3SCbYl7tT22 tlydLnla6yj8rgzvaSMYwM2YH6naD/K1SCrzPKNjlc7PHL4imHGiV0WN+yaz2BGcQWIu 8aJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gjEcuja2ZR2PhI0P3BFYdxjfmKN4SkrB5hLFJZdOOVs=; b=NWmcHVxufwZbNZPw0fmUOM5kvLdBW7CBIeOaf2r6nvqwzS+bT8zHfdZid41p5mwRv7 IQxSpg0AqfTtTfHSVtSyuvDgQ3Pbegw/CUhMfdXWKqiEIMTxcKC7WdGIN4l+f5aVdZbV iN0EeHEi/3piBqhC3zcoztG76XF2Qf3mnNirKZTXxJPdCde72nrntysz+rD3xqB7/XjZ e6pRleePGzfOZgb5A3Rq2MfnWhQ86dIGZJ8KTHRmPSrwg09MJk0/AhGi25Bzb8awXJ3v SnWOxJHXrq1wdJJeIElKNNi88avjcbX9COzHdE1nAa6TSaM83iiLawT0+8ycC02oz4l4 3dMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hJJi7FZ9Uw93pK3BYShOR3z8OuWGtU4RQWmIVtz3c1dA1bL0/ WY5Nv7/tZGvJVqazC4X/ozGm9wssL10=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwB3Q9Ms/T0hqEtuAGYUMRArsd8KkeTalWOuWtf2mTs6YBNYq39ZB8/PE2XwxLuHuH5wzDfjg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6551:: with SMTP id z17mr5230930wrv.266.1602869608579; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from broadband.bt.com ([2a00:23c5:3395:c901:7884:d45a:be26:2f04]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm4330080wrm.51.2020.10.16.10.33.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:33:27 +0100
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
References: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/NDvbCjJHrjE5XWZL5KcUnghFSBA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:33:32 -0000

Greg

It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.

I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to update the tracker.

- Stewart

> On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Authors,
> hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed that the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itself states that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a document is either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email