Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 17 July 2016 07:55 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EE012D1BC; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D8haMwn8edLh; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A435012D1A2; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.15.30] (unknown [213.23.104.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC01918013E4; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:55:10 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
References: <9e5bdf75-0bd8-8643-2c76-51e91844bf35@pi.nu> <4A1FDEDF-8881-4210-82DD-9EECB987828C@cisco.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <1300632b-c30b-5d37-7798-313d9c6bb105@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:55:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4A1FDEDF-8881-4210-82DD-9EECB987828C@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Nevqr-yHAJD5ImbCFqBF5rdneA4>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 07:55:15 -0000
Carlos, Yes - I'm aware of that the question on IPR for the delta is probably a bit "narrow", applying only to the delta info we added to the document. Nevertheless I'd like to see the editors respond to the IPR poll. I had a few words about the limited applicability of the poll in the IPR poll mail initially, but decided that I have to write something more elaborated when we go to wglc. In that context I need the responses for this first IPR poll. /Loa On 2016-07-16 22:42, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Loa, > > I am not aware of any IPR applicable specifically to the delta from draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis (meaning, applicable only to changes from RFC 4379 and the other 3 RFCs that it is attempting to obsolete or otherwise incorporates from other docs) > > The datatracker does not pull IPR declarations from those, that’s probably some text for the Doc shepherd doc and/or question for the AD. > > Thanks, > > — Carlos. > >> On Jul 16, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote: >> >> Working Group, >> >> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis for working >> group last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc. >> >> This is to start the IPR Poll. >> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bi? >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> There is no IPR disclosure filed directly against this documents. >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to >> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant >> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The >> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been >> received from each author and contributor. >> >> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or >> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any >> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> /Loa >> mpls wg co-chair >> >> -- >> >> >> Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >> Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis Loa Andersson