Re: [mpls] Draft submitted - MPLS Entropy Block

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 June 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01E83A0F80 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwDrWv-_LWAo for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B432E3A0FDF for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d66so5809231pfd.6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version; bh=H75/rwz9QIfhWkyAqYhf68img71zVcxNR8vhCp91lUA=; b=I3PxbEarV6CrlrRtqR48fdRUmALSYg5pUkkCUWzXIhuGnub4j6tcJjmwqpXISO/C0g rGWe+Y7/agIXT6L4klAs/EhRPRV8OgofdrVt9K7v26vxSCKjnv7fQRFN1mqiAm1Ii5+J 0tyv4Jg/mapfuhF+UvGWQbPJqTcC5nvdnMNpII/Ml2lGFhduhVheEZ01DaqsZRDM/1k0 KuIVrgxULbIivP+5u10JwjuIErsBE2YhWIA1NXdTrbdJZ6ER9c1bDrInthFbTlU0nXAY Sid5AzUfWlAuOgheHjtsOyqQLSuXuNGyLI4tbHBwVo0p9wEJp9m79BH7VyaRi3GNin0L xzuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version; bh=H75/rwz9QIfhWkyAqYhf68img71zVcxNR8vhCp91lUA=; b=GTkDa3SIMRLpPZXesuGrsl5k9w88650in1LUxLgwuJrbwR4yXSGk9esJI1A1l1VsjN yZfPRFsf8qLfDEljRpypUN/d36GTn1QWctmju8zrmi8pMZQUrlJberPiG95bqbrOi0fq QxU9M1d0HHKyj5fUVY0bt+OgTKWq6W5N1tJdmTKumttEnjA3dsqI5rEFmOl2rlaD2+Uh rD6Y9ZTVVIj5bIpNmRWI6i4GlvKaKNo0LDrcnOI8ryF8axV4sANO6yJwn/7jY5G8UmZ6 F+FnurlfCE2hFE9ClqzijIIEUX+w57utSBAFYCpnAfbqFQZutB0o0/79NkwOIyBMiPUi zJDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GV8vCLL9dnF0Oc9JZJWFoYPgwV61N+f1hozHbkxERnzv5F5jW GZPlpe7eDDrZMzyM0jY8FLE7LNOGi00=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhYFMxIDJDA1Tq1NQRIOEqfeBGPHRIlhmuFaX5C4xxwSU9YCWqgjfNgca2ZJJbCZLWoasgxg==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:60d5:: with SMTP id r21mr13489331pgv.178.1591131302487; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iq19sm3170578pjb.48.2020.06.02.13.55.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:54:49 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "=?utf-8?Q?mpls=40ietf.org?=" <mpls@ietf.org>, Jiang He <jiang.he=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <188d0d07-5e1f-4422-b144-b1ac547558c0@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB3168E8FD0C1562DB7B48C40CE18B0@VI1PR07MB3168.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR07MB3168E8FD0C1562DB7B48C40CE18B0@VI1PR07MB3168.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 188d0d07-5e1f-4422-b144-b1ac547558c0@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5ed6bca3_6ce00443_a91"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/NhQh7DmOb4HckKgc4v8XPGmm1Pc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Draft submitted - MPLS Entropy Block
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 20:55:05 -0000

Hello co-authors,

The solution proposed ignores all the previous work done to address this particular issue. Without going into more details
Please read RFC8662 to better understand all the different pieces involved.
draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc specifically to understand control plane involved.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 2, 2020, 1:47 AM -0700, Jiang He <jiang.he=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>, wrote:
> Hello All,
> I just submitted a draft, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-mpls-entropy-block/ .  it describes an approach for MPLS load balance, by  allocating a specific MPLS label block for entropy usage.
> The purpose is to mitigate the limitation of the number of labels can be pushed and the number of labels can be inspected when looking for entropy information.
>
> Your comments are highly appreciated!
>
> Regards,
> Jiang
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls