Re: [mpls] draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip

"Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE1E1310DE for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwVSN5a-Iz5M for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D84130E98 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1489; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1529501195; x=1530710795; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0K3dzijDZsZ+EL6x3LBCHBHqbX4mNny+vSS+PDiWU+4=; b=RygSJXioeep20dMDDkDZ6XLQNe0oXe8a1tJhTPlz1cJpKV2G1bVMHHj6 bgr+XEqoA2o8Fnd6PusT4L5UwhPp/86/5LdAyZ1OPSSr6kbDaAkb3lwur 3kmm6ZccpHNyS/ZuU03H+wIeKJuob4jkshUcv1zp5lvE7fhSUAZbT6rXZ I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B4AQCMVSpb/xbLJq1bGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUYEoQhiGONOimVFIFlC4RsAoMYOBQBAgEBAQEBAQJtKIU?= =?us-ascii?q?pAQUjFTYGFQsYAgImAgJXEwgBAYMhggCsDoIchFuDbm2BC4kdP4EPJIJohEc?= =?us-ascii?q?BEQIBa4I0glUCmSQJAo8IBoE/hAGCRoU7jBqFHgIECwITAYFYIWFxcBU7gmi?= =?us-ascii?q?QUD2QGQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,247,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="4676338"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jun 2018 13:26:33 +0000
Received: from [10.61.163.57] ([10.61.163.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5KDQWkt025572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:26:33 GMT
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <a7197900-0431-24af-0533-5ffdb0265166@pi.nu>
From: "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9fcdcede-b128-8e56-5a54-d76d7fbcca7d@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:26:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a7197900-0431-24af-0533-5ffdb0265166@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-User: cfilsfil
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/NsFNGbZCbkUVn89vcXO3BlKFEJM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:26:46 -0000

I'm not aware of any other IPRs related to this document than those 
already disclosed

Cheers,
Clarence

On 07/06/2018 12:15, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> 
> We are currently preparing draft draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip for working
> group adoption.
> 
> Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
> 
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> We have copied this mail to the SPRING wg mailing list for information.
> If you receive this mail over the SPRING wg mailing list, and are aware
> of IPRs that apply to the draft, please notify the MPLS wg list.
> 
> 
> /Loa
>    mpls wg co-chair
>