[mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 04 February 2017 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71CD129615; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:55:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mSKSPoPdgKj; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C726D129611; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [112.204.177.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79FB818013BE; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 04:54:59 +0100 (CET)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <881fae47-dfd0-1cfb-0287-4338a030195c@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:54:50 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/OBGrMs33Ba4wePG4lGAk0IU0LOc>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 03:55:08 -0000

Working Group, authors,

I had a quick look at  draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02, I have a few
small nits and questions for the authors.

1. FEC is a well know abbreviation in MPLS context, but it is not 
well-know in wider IETF context. It needs to be expanded at first
occurrence.

2. We have early allocation for this document, can you place the 
following not in the IANA section in section 10.1.

"Note to the RFC Editor (please remove before publication): IANA has
  made early allocation for sub-type 34, 35 and 35. The early allocation
  expires 2017-09-15."

And then we create a "#Protocol" sub-registry in  "Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" We will 
need to define allocation policies and code point range. IMHO the policy
should be "Standards Action" and the code range 0-255.

And a last question, should BGP-LS be in that registry?

/Loa
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64