[mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 07 September 2020 21:31 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885223A0F5E; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.15.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <159951430623.22863.13718864765604329236@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:31:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/OSiHC8gdbyqby9s5ojkgN9yoyb4>
Subject: [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 21:31:47 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In Section 3, it says: "This document registers the following URIs in the IETF XML registry." I think it should say "This document registers the following URIs in the 'ns' sub-registry of the IETF XML registry." I can relate to Barry's comment about "module" vs. "model". I think I understand the difference, but I've run into this with every YANG document that's come up lately: I think the "model" is a formal expression for a configuration of some network component, while "module" is a chunk of YANG code that describes that model, which can be evaluated (a la ABNF) against some input to validate a configuration. I also concur with Barry's remark about BCP 14 being cited when it's not used anywhere. This should be cleaned up (by either using it, or removing the citation). I'm tempted to DISCUSS this, but I assume since it's easily resolved that that'll happen in due course.
- [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Tarek Saad