[mpls] 答复: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)

[Aijun Wang <[e-mail]>]

Hi, All:

 

After reviewing the discussions on this topic on the list, my suggestions
for the WGLC of the mentioned document are the followings:

1)     Because such approach is one major update to the traditional MPLS
functions, before moving this document forward, it is better to make the
design more robust and challengeable with the help of different
implementations

 

2)     Based on the poll responses about "IOAM and PSD", the PSD based
solution is more suitable for the IOAM related scenarios. It is better to
define and assign the "R" bit in LSE format B as "P" bit for PSD based
solution.

 

3)     It's time to make the WG adopt call for the PSD proposal. After
careful reviewing of the PSD by the WG, the current ISD draft can be
refined, to make the output of the community more sustainable.

 

4)     It is no hurry to finalize the MNA related documents. There is the
equivalent IPv6 based solutions, which is more easier to span the different
domains(all controlled by one service provider). Is there any analysis for
the pros and cons of these two solutions(MNA vs IPv6 based solutions)? 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

 

发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
代表 Tarek Saad
发送时间: 2024年9月24日 21:25
收件人: [e-mail]
抄送: MPLS Working Chairs <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]
主题: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG
call)

 

Dear WG,

 

This email starts a two-week Working Group last call for
draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr/> . This is the
2nd WG last call for this document.

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed
to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If
you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and
it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and
nits are most welcome.

 

Please send your comments to the mpls WG mailing list ([e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> ).

If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.

 

Note, currently there are 5 IPR disclosures against this document at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-mn
a-hdr> &id=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr

 

This poll runs until October 8, 2024.

 

Thank you,

Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)