IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [spring] Query related to SR Architecture

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Tue, 15 September 2015 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB6D1B3A9D; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vcixcglkkwpb; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637E21B3A97; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=838; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1442307758; x=1443517358; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=RX0fRbejQTerh7UkL4XK7bxFw7OP8jJiJuX7heI3g2s=; b=ldJog+n4mzBMVh/2vOaltqW7588igCZgu5hkr2uU39Aao6gbVfQANyxc iT0UYbLb990p2DBWoc6sjwLOHq1YZ9innAkD6l/VlCp442MvA1rznMABP 3P69rGFe7kcSFsm2mlV89+r8wfS2T4liR3vKriwcRsdXlCax4se1PpbPw s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D1AQBp3fdV/4oNJK1egyNUaQasXZBlAQ2BbwqFL0oCgTw4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEDAQEBATctBwsFCwIBCA4EJBAnCxMEDgIEDgUbh34DCggNyVgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIZzgg+CboJQggozB4MYgRQBBIV7DIwtgygBixqBaAKTRYc8HwEBQoQBcYklgQUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,534,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="187765452"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Sep 2015 09:02:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8F92bCO004965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:02:37 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:02:36 -0500
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (173.36.12.85) by xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:02:36 -0500
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.101]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:02:36 -0500
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Usman Latif <osmankh@yahoo.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Query related to SR Architecture
Thread-Index: AQHQ74q5kSG4WXM9AUWqMysuWBb7M549n0SA
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:02:36 +0000
Message-ID: <E395A857-A9E9-428A-A18F-210F689A95BB@cisco.com>
References: <197940302.24606.1442303093417.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <197940302.24606.1442303093417.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.26]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2E6FC39A7ED5B442933A6B8F2BC1B953@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/OjA-7SIkvc5IN2cymCxgBNKUNBA>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Query related to SR Architecture
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:02:42 -0000

Hi,

if you're an operator (SP, content, etc) and looking for a multicast solution, maybe you should have a look at BIER WG.


Thanks.

s.


On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Usman Latif <osmankh@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have a basic question around SPRING/SR.
> 
> How can an IP/MPLS carrier in the market today deploy SPRING in their core network without SR being able to support efficient multicast routing in the network?
> Are we not restricting carriers by proposing the SPRING/SR architecture when we know it does not efficiently support routing of multicast traffic?
> 
> I would like get some feedback on this point
> 
> 
> thanks,
> Usman
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email